Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
If you watch most rugby games in general the team who has the weight of possesion tends to get more of the calls as they have the ball more.
I think it took nearly 30 minutes in the first half for us to get repeat sets, then second half we just couldn't going.
I was in front of the incident where the wakefield player hit his head, and i hope he is ok, but the touch judge must have said something for him to?
Think in the grand scheme of things he had a ok game hicks, and to be honest I think a lot of the complaints at him were more out of frustration with the team.
And agree i think some games the ref can decide a game with 50-50 calls but i feel like he could have given salford 50 pens on the wakey line and they still would't have socred,
If you watch most rugby games in general the team who has the weight of possesion tends to get more of the calls as they have the ball more.
I think it took nearly 30 minutes in the first half for us to get repeat sets, then second half we just couldn't going.
I was in front of the incident where the wakefield player hit his head, and i hope he is ok, but the touch judge must have said something for him to?
Think in the grand scheme of things he had a ok game hicks, and to be honest I think a lot of the complaints at him were more out of frustration with the team.
And agree i think some games the ref can decide a game with 50-50 calls but i feel like he could have given salford 50 pens on the wakey line and they still would't have socred,
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.