Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
Quote="PAUL M"It has and he was. I mentioned Briggs the previous weekend after I was told we were looking to do a deal with Fev for him.
Only watched him once and he seems more of a running 6 to me, no real passing or kicking game to speak of but does remind me a bit of Tomkins the way he runs and steps and seems to be quite strong. Personally I think we need more of an organiser but would take any halfback right now so that we have additional
">cover.'"
I would say you have him summed up pretty well there. Now, if its an organiser you're after, right club wrong halfback.
Quote="PAUL M"It has and he was. I mentioned Briggs the previous weekend after I was told we were looking to do a deal with Fev for him.
Only watched him once and he seems more of a running 6 to me, no real passing or kicking game to speak of but does remind me a bit of Tomkins the way he runs and steps and seems to be quite strong. Personally I think we need more of an organiser but would take any halfback right now so that we have additional
">cover.'"
I would say you have him summed up pretty well there. Now, if its an organiser you're after, right club wrong halfback.
Personally if Rovelli is here for one year to bolster Horne/Long in the halves then it's a decent enough move. He is not top class but you won't get that at this late stage, he does have experience and could do a job for the year. That then leaves us cap and salary space to find a more proven option for 2012.
That said I would have like us to try with Briggs as he could be a really good option for the future.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.