Hes been given a two match ban. That's ridiculous

Why ?? O'Loughlin got a one match for a clothes line (high tackle) that would have done the WWE proud !!



He's got deseverdly banned don't disagree with that at all but for all the C charges recently that got reduced to one match bans for Warrington, Wigan and others it's certainly not out of line.



Oh your owner needs to keep his mouth shut too couldn't see Ken Davy commenting if it was the other way mindst maybe this will lead to another failed coup against the RL unless they increase Broughs ban.



Be sad for Salford if he and his money go but not perhaps for the rest of us.

Whereas I agree the good Doctor needs to be more prudent when commenting publicly, was it not your much missed Mr Anderson who called for the book to be thrown at Chase after his season-ending (sic) tackle on Ferres? Hmm. No strawman responses: I am not defending Chase.

Quote ="Hillbilly_Red"Whereas I agree the good Doctor needs to be more prudent when commenting publicly, was it not your much missed Mr Anderson who called for the book to be thrown at Chase after his season-ending (sic) tackle on Ferres? Hmm. No strawman responses: I am not defending ">Chase.'" Had it been Watson I would have said fair play and yes Anderson should have kept his mouth shut. I think the reaction to the Ferres incident was for him getting 7 matches for a spear tackle on Lomax who wasnt even injured and played on when since that the average has gone back to 2 or 3. Brough was stupid on Sunday your guys got to him and he bottled it last time he didn't play we beat Hull so it might be a bonus.

Quote ="Hillbilly_Red"Whereas I agree the good Doctor needs to be more prudent when commenting publicly, was it not your much missed Mr Anderson who called for the book to be thrown at Chase after his season-ending (sic) tackle on Ferres? Hmm. No strawman responses: I am not defending ">Chase.'" Had it been Watson I would have said fair play and yes Anderson should have kept his mouth shut. I think the reaction to the Ferres incident was for him getting 7 matches for a spear tackle on Lomax who wasnt even injured and played on when since that the average has gone back to 2 or 3. Brough was stupid on Sunday your guys got to him and he bottled it last time he didn't play we beat Hull so it might be a bonus.

Quote ="fartown since 1961"Why ?? O'Loughlin got a one match for a clothes line (high tackle) that would have done the WWE proud !! He's got deseverdly banned don't disagree with that at all but for all the C charges recently that got reduced to one match bans for Warrington, Wigan and others it's certainly not out of line. Oh your owner needs to keep his mouth shut too couldn't see Ken Davy commenting if it was the other way mindst maybe this will lead to another failed coup against the RL unless they increase Broughs ban. Be sad for Salford if he and his money go but not perhaps for the rest of ">us.'" Its the The RFL disciplinary thats annoyed me more than Brough has to be honest. They have annoyed me all season and fat Nigel says there's nothing wrong with it. They said he used his forearm, did they watch the footage. : icon_mad.gif" alt="icon_mad.gif" title="Mad" /> The RFL said on their page The tribunal are aware the player does not have a bad previous disciplinary record and has been in the game for a number of years. Taking this into consideration this tribunal feel they can go to the lower end of the grading and impose a 2 match suspension and a £300 fine. Did they watch his challenge on Caton Brown a few months ago? The tackle he did on Caton Brown made him miss 12 weeks of the season and he had no case to answer... Why? Chase's tackle was bad last season on Ferres and he deserved the ban but Brough tackle was ridiculous. Marwan did suggest that there were two people on the panel from Huddersfield at the time of the hearing as well which annoys me even more This is nothing against Huddersfield Giants, i just hate how The RFL disciplinary panel go about things.

Quote ="fartown since 1961"Why ?? O'Loughlin got a one match for a clothes line (high tackle) that would have done the WWE proud !! He's got deseverdly banned don't disagree with that at all but for all the C charges recently that got reduced to one match bans for Warrington, Wigan and others it's certainly not out of line. Oh your owner needs to keep his mouth shut too couldn't see Ken Davy commenting if it was the other way mindst maybe this will lead to another failed coup against the RL unless they increase Broughs ban. Be sad for Salford if he and his money go but not perhaps for the rest of ">us.'" Its the The RFL disciplinary thats annoyed me more than Brough has to be honest. They have annoyed me all season and fat Nigel says there's nothing wrong with it. They said he used his forearm, did they watch the footage. : icon_mad.gif" alt="icon_mad.gif" title="Mad" /> The RFL said on their page The tribunal are aware the player does not have a bad previous disciplinary record and has been in the game for a number of years. Taking this into consideration this tribunal feel they can go to the lower end of the grading and impose a 2 match suspension and a £300 fine. Did they watch his challenge on Caton Brown a few months ago? The tackle he did on Caton Brown made him miss 12 weeks of the season and he had no case to answer... Why? Chase's tackle was bad last season on Ferres and he deserved the ban but Brough tackle was ridiculous. Marwan did suggest that there were two people on the panel from Huddersfield at the time of the hearing as well which annoys me even more This is nothing against Huddersfield Giants, i just hate how The RFL disciplinary panel go about things.

Quote ="fartown since 1961"Oh your owner needs to keep his mouth shut too couldn't see Ken Davy commenting if it was the other way mindst maybe this will lead to another failed coup against the RL unless they increase Broughs ban. '" Dr Koukash waited until the Disciplinary gave their findings until commenting - just as Hudgell has done;just as Carter has done etc. Anderson commented straight after the game and tried/succeeded in influencing the committee.As have other coaches,at other clubs,since. He is allowed an opinion.Just as Davy agrees with the salary cap...

Quote ="fartown since 1961"Oh your owner needs to keep his mouth shut too couldn't see Ken Davy commenting if it was the other way mindst maybe this will lead to another failed coup against the RL unless they increase Broughs ban. '" Dr Koukash waited until the Disciplinary gave their findings until commenting - just as Hudgell has done;just as Carter has done etc. Anderson commented straight after the game and tried/succeeded in influencing the committee.As have other coaches,at other clubs,since. He is allowed an opinion.Just as Davy agrees with the salary cap...