Phuzzy wrote:Mate, I don't wish to be condescending here but do you understand a Straw man argument? Forgive me if you do but it's essentially putting words into someone's mouth then arguing against it, even though they never said the thing you're arguing against. I have never done that with you so, no, we can't all claim that.
You on the other hand have suggested I'm using Hastings' attitude in this game as some benchmark for an underlying problem at Wigan. I've never said that. You're saying I blame Hastings for the loss. I've never said that. You're now asking do I think he should play for us as if I've brought this up as an option. I haven't. Questioning someone on an individual attitude to an individual game does not mean, or even remotely suggest, any of the above.
I only asked should hastings go because if is attitude stinks and is a disgrace as you out it then what do we do, surely that unacceptable attitude will rise to the surface in other ways?
On the strawman
Well to be fair you have already told me that I have no other arguments (so who's putting words in whos mouth?)
You told me I was ok with us parking the bus (putting words in my mouth again)
In a nother post you've already told me that you cant believe something would be true or I could think that when it was you who came up with the statement not me (thanks again for telling me what I was thinking).
Your words
"I'm not usually one for bagging individual players and I like Hastings. However last night's attitude was a disgrace and no way to go into a top flight sporting contest. His attitude set the tone. Salford wanted it more and it showed."
And yet you then say later when challenged that you didnt say Hastings attitude was the only factor
You said his attitude set the tone
His attitude was a disgrace
Salford wanted it more, more than who? JUST HASTINGS?
So why no post on the other co tributing factors?
Smith's tackling
Lams coaching/substitutions/tactical decisions?
Poor.kicking game.and general bad end to sets which 5/6 players need to accept responsibility for
I'll say my final words on the subject
Whether Hastings celebrated in the way you did or didnt want him to.
Whether hastings talking about his former club and showing respect, too much respect
Etc
Then IMO made NO difference to the 80mins of the game.
"If" French gets the ball and we go 20 -8 up we win and No such thread about Hastings exists
"If" Smith makes that simple one on one tackle the same
"If" hankinson kicks that goal at 14- 2 then maybe even the same.
If Powell passes the ball, or IMO shouldnt have had his hands in the ball in that situation. Then the same
"If" whilst already one natural forward short due to Isa playing centre we dont bring another forward off and put another pivot on and we hand the forward momentum to Salford (who made.somthing like 500mtrs.more than us 2nd half) then the same.
And I'm not having that hastings saying nice words about Salford (just like Lam would have said or anyone else if asked about salford) had any effect on Wigans performance or the performance of other players.
If it did then youd need to ask the other players and coaches why they were so unprofessional as to let them effect it or not kick him up the backside if he wasnt doing or performing in the way he should.
I agree attitude/desire etc play big parts in success, whilst maybe not ideal it can be difficult to play against former clubs etc.
But to use that as the foundation for ay blame.for a single result, whilst ignoring dozens of other factors which IMO are more deep rooted st the club is unfair.
Our success or.lsck of this year will be dictated far.more bu those dozen other issues than whether Hastings still has a soft spot for Salford