ccs wrote:Councillor Stephen Brady on RH tonight at 17:00.
It's a shame Brady didn't put over his case very well, and I doubt I'll do any better.......
He basically said that the council wanted to come to an amicable agreement, but Mr Allam wanted the council to "break the law" so that Mr Allam got what they wanted now, rather than in the proposed time frame which was more than achievable.
Mr Allam also now wants the council to pay half the costs of the bubble pitch and an eighteen month rates "holiday". Mr Allam knew the council couldn't come up with the goods even if they'd wanted to.
The one worry thing Brady said was that an injunction would cost the tax payers serious money, almost suggesting it was not been considered for that very reason.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Diogenes wrote:An injunction would cost about £50k. Money well spent and if the council won Allam would have to pay most of their costs.
I suspect that not winning was also considered, because Mr Allam would then have sued the council for serious money for the loss of FA income for his grade 2 academy.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Joined: Mar 11 2007 Posts: 5659 Location: Next to Ramsgate Sands c.1850 in West Hull
ccs wrote:Stop Mr Allam doing what he has now done.
How, though?
Would an injunction be legal if Allam has not broken the terms of the lease? If he has (which from a cursory look at the section posted by Angus Young the other week looks likely) then the Council should be able to stop them without the need for an injunction, surely?
What are the options actually open to the council if the terms of the lease have been breached?
Philip Larkin wrote:
There ain’t no music East side of this city That’s mellow like mine is, That’s mellow like mine.
Would an injunction be legal if Allam has not broken the terms of the lease? If he has (which from a cursory look at the section posted by Angus Young the other week looks likely) then the Council should be able to stop them without the need for an injunction, surely?
What are the options actually open to the council if the terms of the lease have been breached?
Ask Mr Brady.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
Joined: Aug 30 2005 Posts: 3231 Location: in a cave
WormInHand wrote:How, though?
Would an injunction be legal if Allam has not broken the terms of the lease? If he has (which from a cursory look at the section posted by Angus Young the other week looks likely) then the Council should be able to stop them without the need for an injunction, surely?
What are the options actually open to the council if the terms of the lease have been breached?
The court would only grant an injunction if Allam was in breach of the lease.
If he is in breach of the lease, how do you suggest the council stop Allam doing what he is doing without a court order?
First there was wisdom Then there was knowledge Now there is only information
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum