would change the 2 in bold around so we have some agression/impact on the field from the start. The props need to be balanced and compliment each other.
Also think signing rooney is a waste of cap space as if wakey are getting rid why would we want him? Would rather see whiting at centre and horne at 6 or instead of spending money on rooney use that to find a new centre and have whiting as cover or pushing for a bench spot
Never criticise a man until you have walked a mile in his shoes.........that way you'll be a mile away and have his shoes.
abel711989 wrote:would change the 2 in bold around so we have some agression/impact on the field from the start. The props need to be balanced and compliment each other.
I can agree with that. To be honest I wouldn't be bothered who started out the two as long as O'Meley played 40 minutes each week.
Joined: Jan 10 2007 Posts: 6766 Location: Stalking Jerry Langford
Dave K. wrote:Would be a back up player though, unlike Thorman.
I see what your saying but is he willing to come to play second fiddle to whoever? The thing is, he aint good enough for the Wakefield starting line up but if he is prepared to take probably less money and no guarantee of first team football then it he would be well worth taking.
I don't see it as a job. It is a passion and love that we all share. Neil Hudgell
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
