Only 7 Football Premiership winners in the last 25 years, 3 teams have won it once, plenty more teams competing, and ManU have won more than half of them.



I wonder what "Super League should've created a more competitive league" really means?

Nearer the twelve NRL winners than the four SL winners.

Easy to say that, on day one nobody had won SL.



What would you have done?



All people do is whinge when the RFL/SL make changes to try and make the game more competitive.

True, there's no easy answer. Maybe with the exception of Bradford. Saints, Leeds and Wigan have a production line of talented youngsters.

The salary cap needs scraping as all It does is hold the game back and the quality lowers



It's still the same as it was in 1999 pretty much which is why it's gone backwards



Other sports have moved forward we haven't

I don't think scraping the salary cap will make a scrap of difference.

Of course it does the standard has been on the decline for 10 years



The NRL has gone leaps and bounds we've gone backwards



Also giving away sponsorships to lorry or pizza firms for free doesn't help



No wonder there's no money in the game



Also basically telling sky "we'll take anything"

And here's me thinking the NRL has a salary cap, just as we do.



And, by the way, scrapping is the word you're looking for, not scraping.

Yes they do but their salary cap has grown to nearly 10m



Ours still similar to the 1.8m signed in 1999

Maybe they can afford it. (And it's £5m this year)



.... and this is what ours was in 1999

Very Poor in 20 years inflation



You trying to defend it is why SL is on its booty

I'm not defending anybody, just highlighting how inaccurate your posts are.



A 5% increase per annum isn't a bad return by today's standards.