Quote DaveO="DaveO"He won't be proved right or wrong whatever the result because no one will be able to say what effect of playing him would have had on the result if he is left out. If we win, we may well still have won with Ainscough in the side. If we lose, we may well have lost with him in the side.
I'"
Well that really depends on what happens in the match, doesn't it.
If Ainscough doesn't play, and we fluff several try-scoring opportunities down the left, then it could well be argued that Noble has been proved wrong. On the other hand, if Ainscough does play, and lets in three tries because he's been caught out under the bomb, then that proves [uyou[/u wrong.
And before this draws another heated reply from the 'we hate Noble' corner, I reiterate that I disagree with Noble on many things, including this. I'd play Ainscough for his attack, and would risk him in defence. But he can look flimsy under the high ball. That's an observation, not something I've been told as part of a bandwagoning exercise.