At the age of 30 & whilst being a utility player (wing/2nd row/centre) my personel opinion is no. Pay the players coming up from the reserves - Harrison, Mitchell, Blythe. Tyrone more & let him go.



Discuss

Johnson is a very good player, but unfortunatly is too injury prone. You could have the best player in the world, but if their sat in the stands every week it's pointless.



I'd maybe keep him in a coachin role for a couple of years to try and teach his running lines and his style to up and comers.



Unfortunatly he is no where near earning a full time playing contract, which is a shame, because as said before, i rate his ability quite alot

Purely goes on fitness assessment. I bet Johnson is quite a big earner, so he's not cost effective if he's injured all the time. Like you say there's no problems with his ability and he's always had a good attitude, so its a shame.

This is a really good question, when fit Johnson is a top quality player with real class. But that is the problem he is never fit. I would have to say no, sorry.

as above



No

i'm fifty fifty on this one,his form prior to his last injury was outstanding but i'm not sure we can keep him injury free for long enough for him to be of real value to the team on the pitch or financially.

i would expect him to be moved on though.

It all depends on the figures involved. If he wants £130k then no chance, £30k definately yes. The reality will be somewhere inbetween and if it's somewhere near the bottom of the pay scale then I would give him another year. If he wants to hold out for his final big fat juicy paycheck then perhaps he'd be better in cherry and white!

Not for me, he does good stuf at times, but i think he can over play when it is not needed

He doesn't get into my first choice 17 as a back.



He doesn't get into my first choice 17 as a forward.



On that Rationale, I'd say get rid. That said, if they let say Vinnie Anderson go, I do think you need some athletes in the pack, so then I'd be more inclined to keep him. If it was keep Vinnie or PJ, I'd keep Vinnie, assuming that they earn similar.

It all depends if his wages hinder our attempts to sign a player who is younger, fitter and a better prospect.

No.

Too injury prone

I have mixed views on Johnson, he's a good player to have in your team because of his versatility, although he hasn't got the speed for Wing he is a solid 2nd row or centre.

I'm sure he will do a good job on Sunday instead of Westwood but he does visit the the treatment room far to often, if he can put in some solid performances and stay injury free from now until the end of the year i would give him a years contract but if another team was to make a bid it would be worth some serious thought.

I've said before I would rather us keep Vanderson or Johnson, instead of them both. On current form, I would keep Vanderson...but I do like PJ's attitude.

No.

I think its all been said. A quality player but injuries have taken there toll and he is probably past his best.

I really like Johnson, but you're right.

Sad it may be but life moves on. (A few years ago was as good as Gilmore is now).

Yes.



























































But only to be awkward............

If he would accept a low contract I would keep him but really can't see in.



Shame really if he's fit he's good, but watching him play I always get the feeling that another injury is just around the corner.

And for that exact reason an unfortunate No.

Sadly no. He's seems a great guy attitude wise, but now his best days are behind him rather than in front.

Sorry too injury prone and to long in the tooth.



=redNo

I'd have him put the cones out and wearing the headphones.

That game against stains last year somes him up really...puts out some of the best passes ive ever seen for hicks on that centre in man of steel form oonly to break his leg in the 2nd half :/

Can't see him agreeing to that when he's only 30 & probably wants to carry on playing