I’d agree you’re no Columbo, and neither am I , but I would have assumed there’d be a motive to cohered on a complaint.

Leigh club has nothing to gain from another suspension to McGuire.



My best guess is that it is purely a moral stance from the Leigh club to support their player.

Moral stance does not constitute evidence, guess my point is why take till Tuesday to provide evidence

John 8:7

When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.”



That’s most of us not throwing stones then, is it ok to throw one at Charnley.

you know *THREAD DIGRESSION WARNING* just on the biblical quotes. i was quite disapointed that the club( who aren't affraid of a little copyright infringement) when we signed blake austin, they didn't do a rip off, of the famous WW t shirts for stone called steve austin that said



AUSTIN

3:16



they could have amended it to



AUSTIN

6:13



(cos he wore six and there are 13 players in a team)



thats money missed

Monday was a bank holiday?

MRP still sat on the Monday. And McDonnell appeal was heard the next day.

No doubt the panel were attracted by treble time for the sitting.

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/61 ... view-panel

https://www.rugby-league.com/article/61 ... view-panel

Excuse my ignorance, but does this mean he is already guilty and the tribunal are going to meet to set his sentence, or is this where he can put forward his defence and try to plead his innocence?

Thus is what he's being charged with and he can argue his case.

Ok. Will be interesting to see how it pans out. From rumours on here, it appears to be Leigh providing all the evidence, and while that might be enough for a RL tribunal to go along with, I'd be interested to know if that could stand up in an actual civil court, if McGuire were to be certain of his innocence and felt he needed to clear his reputation from what would be a huge stain on his character, not just within sporting circles?