If we could only sign one more player for 2015 what position would you strengthen?

Paul Gallen can play prop and loose forward.



Job done

And coinidentally has a red devil tattoo.

Stalker

Footy Show watcher.

Did they say why he has it?

Does he also have a tattoo that says "Non-fed trained and, since your squad for next season already appears to have more non-fed trained players than you're allowed, you've more chance of signing Paul Cullen than Paul Gallen"?



It would probably be all down one arm or something like that.

He might have exemption tattooed on his other arm..

TBH I've no clue where we are with Quota - Fed-non- players for 2015 , no doubt someone east of the Pennine's will enlighten us.

I'm sort of east of the Pennines





To my knowledge, Salford will have contracted for next year: Locke, Dobson, Huaraki, Chase, Puletua, Rapira and Sau who are definitely non-fed trained, and thus 7/7 of the non-fed spots taken.



For anyone to come in 1 of those would have to leave (not getting into any sort of cap space discussion)

What about Lama Tasi. Will he have to leave?

Yup. Tasi makes eight. Actually, Tim Smith is still contracted to Salford, so that's nine.



Assuming Tim Smith makes his Wakefield move permanent, that's still one non-fed player too many. So unless one of the eight has some kind of exemption, one will have to go before the start of next season.

Surely Chase would've had to have been classed as fed Trained to have qualified to play for for the national side .. there ,blue touch paper lit

be leaving) - I am going to have to go and do some research into people's backgrounds I suppose. I can't see any reason why any of the 8 already mentioned aren't counted, so someone is leaving out of the list I'd guess?

If Widdop came back he'd class as non fed as well and he's a real Englishman





He also came over in 2009 meaning he's not part of the pre2008 exemption lot, nor is he part of the crusaders exemption lot