I have you sussed, you are John Wilkin. You have just given the most biased commentating ever heard on TV

Its just further evidence that Saints are reffed slightly differently, Lomax gets hit with force after releasing the ball and the ref sends Lomax off the field for 2 minutes. Commentary is similar that ex Wigoon Bell End Clarke now saying the ref should looking at changing the rules when Saints give away set res-starts, he calls it cheating in his post match commentary. Kevin Brown really showed up Clarke in the way the game is played instead of the way Clarke wants it played.



On the game itself thought it was heroic for both teams to hammer away for the full 80 mins. Both the Giants and Saints will get better as the season progresses.

[/u



And if they don't, it leaves a great opportunity for other clubs (apart from Saints or Hudds) to win the big prizes. Now that would be nice.

Huddersfield wouldn't look so good if they didn't cheat and use a dangerous pitch to take out one of our heroes in the first minute.



How did such a dangerous pitch that caused Mata'tua to fail a HIA not get penalised? If that was the glorious turf at the Totally Wicked stadium it would have got a 2 match ban, at least. Another example of bent refereeing and another name in my book of enemies.



#therflarelizardpeople



#saintsarefactuallythebestsportsteameverimo

Are you unwell or just 9?

this is getting boring now

Only boring because we've won a couple on the spin and you're realising that maybe we're not as bad as you were hoping.

As tedious as this thread is, it's probably the right place to make observations about this Saints squad (who clearly can be stopped) so I'll throw my two penneth in.



One of the things that is helping make them so successful is that they've found a couple of ways to break the rules that are seemingly never going to get penalised any more and it's giving them tiny advantages at least once or twice every set. When they're attacking and their player is tackled they either move forward in the process of getting up, or after playing the ball move forward and engage the first marker - Walmsley in particular does this on practically every carry. When defending they have the standard late man in to slow down the ruck, but there's also a real tendency to get off their man at the back of the ruck and make no attempt to move so that the attacking hooker/acting 9 can access the ball - this happened probably half a dozen times last night, too many times to be chance, they're clearly coached to get up and stand in the way. Combine these factors with their apparent willingness to give away six agains and you've got them being allowed a huge amount of control over the speed of the game that they shouldn't have.



And before the over sensitive Saints fans come charging on, yes, I know all sides have moments when these things happen, it just doesn't seem coached into them, it doesn't seem part of their game plan. Much like when we were all criticising Wigan for trapping arms and cannonballing, just because they happened at other teams didn't mean they weren't a bigger culprit.



Also, I'm not blaming Saints, I'm blaming the authorities, because every single one of those things should be penalised and they've gone too far on the leniency in search of a faster game. If you penalised those things they'd largely stop and you'd still have a faster game.



So yeah, that's that.

On a similar vein, Phil Clark has called out Saints for purposely slowing the ball carrier out over and over again. He notes that Saints would prefer to reset the tackle count in exchange to give the defensive line time to organise themselves. He claims this style of cheating needs to be addressed. I personally think it is just playing to the referee - there is nothing stopping opposition teams doing the same. https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/phil-cla ... eld-71287/

On a similar vein, Phil Clark has called out Saints for purposely slowing the ball carrier out over and over again. He notes that Saints would prefer to reset the tackle count in exchange to give the defensive line time to organise themselves. He claims this style of cheating needs to be addressed. I personally think it is just playing to the referee - there is nothing stopping opposition teams doing the same. https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/phil-cla ... eld-71287/

Quote Leeds_Luke="Leeds_Luke"On a similar vein, Phil Clark has called out Saints for purposely slowing the ball carrier out over and over again. He notes that Saints would prefer to reset the tackle count in exchange to give the defensive line time to organise themselves. He claims this style of cheating needs to be addressed. I personally think it is just playing to the referee - there is nothing stopping opposition teams doing the same. https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/phil-cla ... eld-71287/'" Indeed. Hull did it far more blatantly the week before, but Phil didn't mind that as he didn't want us to win that game either. It's a goal of all teams to slow the play down, it goes without saying. There is a valid debate about whether six agains work as they are intended to though. Pretty much all teams now abuse it on the 1st as ensuring a set defensive line to start the set is preferrable to one less tackle. Referees are then very reluctant to give another six again in the same set of six and it's rare that they do. It's also something attacking teams try to play the system on as much as possible too. If you watch the game last night, I lost count of the number of times Peats deliberately ran at markers who weren't set because Huddersfield got a quick play the ball or moved off the mark and then stopped and threw his arms up, in an attempt to con the referee into giving a six again. Ashton Golding even ignored a 4 on 2 overlap to do that and appeal to the referee. Moving off the mark is another thing that winds me up about our game, it sets the markers off square and the defensive line two yards offside and the crowd and attacking team baying for a penalty or six again. Again, all teams do it and the refs rarely ever send them back. It's a sad indictment on Super League really that our coaches and players are this obsessed with playing the system. I watch the NRL this morning and it's genuinely like watching a different sport. Clean play the balls, both teams striving for the win rather than going through the motions like we see over here and competing.

Quote Leeds_Luke="Leeds_Luke"On a similar vein, Phil Clark has called out Saints for purposely slowing the ball carrier out over and over again. He notes that Saints would prefer to reset the tackle count in exchange to give the defensive line time to organise themselves. He claims this style of cheating needs to be addressed. I personally think it is just playing to the referee - there is nothing stopping opposition teams doing the same. https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/phil-cla ... eld-71287/'" Indeed. Hull did it far more blatantly the week before, but Phil didn't mind that as he didn't want us to win that game either. It's a goal of all teams to slow the play down, it goes without saying. There is a valid debate about whether six agains work as they are intended to though. Pretty much all teams now abuse it on the 1st as ensuring a set defensive line to start the set is preferrable to one less tackle. Referees are then very reluctant to give another six again in the same set of six and it's rare that they do. It's also something attacking teams try to play the system on as much as possible too. If you watch the game last night, I lost count of the number of times Peats deliberately ran at markers who weren't set because Huddersfield got a quick play the ball or moved off the mark and then stopped and threw his arms up, in an attempt to con the referee into giving a six again. Ashton Golding even ignored a 4 on 2 overlap to do that and appeal to the referee. Moving off the mark is another thing that winds me up about our game, it sets the markers off square and the defensive line two yards offside and the crowd and attacking team baying for a penalty or six again. Again, all teams do it and the refs rarely ever send them back. It's a sad indictment on Super League really that our coaches and players are this obsessed with playing the system. I watch the NRL this morning and it's genuinely like watching a different sport. Clean play the balls, both teams striving for the win rather than going through the motions like we see over here and competing.

yeah, that must be it

You regularly criticise Walmsley then do you? He makes more yards between the tackle and the PTB than he does in the actual carry.