There's been far worse than Chan and in the short few games hes played hes shown "glimpses" of potential but not enough.
Runs very hard and is fast for a forward but not great defensively and has a mistake in him too. Id be gobsmacked if he ever made the grade at the Warriors. Can see him maybe at a Cas, Wakey, Bradford or Featherstone in all honesty in the coming seasons
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25774 Location: Back in Hull.
The fact he couldn't get into our 17 last week, with the players we had out, says it all, like above not really sure what his position is, but maybe shouldn't be judged on his time too much here.
Dave K. wrote:The fact he couldn't get into our 17 last week, with the players we had out, says it all, like above not really sure what his position is, but maybe shouldn't be judged on his time too much here.
I like Chan, he needs to be on the field more but as bonaire says he should be in the second row. He's mobile, quick and runs hard, he's only a kid still and brings good energy off the bench.
It's harsh to judge him playing in a crap team, with crap structures and crap coaching.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum