|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef79b/ef79b6c749043bc1d4387ae339e97b0927c21bc9" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9129 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| More about insurance going forwards. I read a piece (by Robert Hicks iirc) that the game's previous insurer chose not to renew its cover. A grand total of one provider, asking roughly treble the previous premium, offered us a policy. Against that backdrop things look pretty grim. I don't think for a minute that the tackling height change will make the game safer; but a bit like cas and wakeys' stadium plans of decades past, it might just about keep things going for a few more years before a really harsh change comes about.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9129 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Whilst this doesn't allay my concerns, I've a couple of mates who've been playing union with restricted height tackles. After a few games with lots of pens & a few cards tacklers changed their approach. Year and a half on, it's pretty much a forgotten issue now, so they tell me.
Though I do understand all the "buts".
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 2995 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2020 | 5 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| With hindsight, the game should have brought these rules into the junior leagues 15 years ago when the talk around head impacts in contact sports started, so that we'd now have a generation of players and coaches who had already adapted to the new tackle height.
I think it will be chaotic for a while, but the refs will become more lenient over time, as Clearwing mentioned. That's basically what happened with the current rules for most of the games history. Any borderline tackle was usually let go.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 4719 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2018 | 6 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Maybe the new rules will work in time. Are the same rules being adopted in Australia?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 2995 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2020 | 5 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 4719 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2018 | 6 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Again I’m firmly in the camp of reasonable reduction of risk in training and games, and healthy return-to-play protocols.
We have to decide what level of risk is acceptable and understand you simply cannot design all risk out of a contact sport. Maybe it will be possible to find a balance but I haven’t seen it so far.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef79b/ef79b6c749043bc1d4387ae339e97b0927c21bc9" alt="" |
|