ploinerrhino wrote:Not sure i get this Sangare has been impactful at all
All rephrase. Sangare has been what I expected. He’s raw and makes the odd error/defensive lapse, but he’s big, can skittle a defender and offload. He’s exactly the type of prop who has been causing us problems for years in the mould of Paasi or Kasiano, granted he’s not the finished article.
Also realise my previous post may have been unfair to Tom Holroyd, who has been pretty good.
Barrie’s Glass Eye wrote:All rephrase. Sangare has been what I expected. He’s raw and makes the odd error/defensive lapse, but he’s big, can skittle a defender and offload. He’s exactly the type of prop who has been causing us problems for years in the mould of Paasi or Kasiano, granted he’s not the finished article.
Also realise my previous post may have been unfair to Tom Holroyd, who has been pretty good.
Shabino wrote:Not sure ‘pretty good’ cuts it anymore…..
No I think he’s been very good actually. But they all need to be paying, ‘very wellI’ most of the time now. Long gone are the days where we could just turn it on at will and blitz teams…..
Jack Burton wrote:If he's going to cement a place in the 17 in the front row, then he needs to improve his defence and up the amount of carries he makes. All our props are currently 3rd or 4th props. We really need a proper leader in the front row. This is the role Mik should be doing, but it's clear he's still working his way back to full fitness.
Holroyd is our best prop he's got aggression and a massive engine and he'll get better and better quality.
Holroyd and Walters are our two best props,Mik is way off at the minute. Lisone is a ten minute man and as for Sangare,well to be honest Donaldson is better value
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
