I agree that would be better. Although eany extra cash would have to come from somewhere, and if it isn’t from cutting other clubs’ share, it isn’t obvious where that’d be. And a cap exemption is only valuable to the wealthier clubs, meaning the reserves league would likely remain small, if we’re relying on that.

I think there’s almost an acknowledgement there that it isn’t worth it in of itself, if it needs incentivising or to be forced on clubs. With the SL clubs now seemingly taking leadership, while the RFL mainly just does the administrative stuff, who is there to cajole them to do it?

I'd have gladly said it publicly but the forum rules don't permit it and it would be deleted - that's what PM's are for, what part of that don't you get?

Still you post my PM if you like and see what happens - personally I'm fine with it.

It really is not!

Strange because whenever I get involved in an argument on here I'm told to take it to PM's, it would help if you lot were consistent.

=#FF0000That will be because we don't want board threads filling with thread drift rubbish. However, all posts, whether they be public on threads or private in PMs, are bound by the AUP so please be warned of that fact. Thank you.

Wouldn't be surprised to see Hull release a few squad players. You have linked up with Hull University in a partnership that will see some of their players train with Hull and play for your Reserves.