It would only have been red had he made contact with the head.



I sure you post what suits you on a previous post you stated the above.

Like most refs, his logic is impossible to follow.

Yep another sensible post. Do you respond so flippantly when a player queries your decision or do you save your sarcasm for a message board?

He has not got the brain to be sarcastic.

NB a while ago a I called you a tool and you have done nothing to persuade me otherwise. A head high shot means a red card. The newspapers said red card, the TV media showed a head shot and said a red card, the fans saw a head shot, the team saw a head shot, the player felt the head shot and had the bruises to prove it, you and the video ref are the only two saying different so why argue about something which has been proven. You leave yourself wide open when you still argue against a proven fact

Just to say how delighted me and my lad were with the team's performance and the result on Sunday. We're really looking forward to seeing the team in SUper League next year, which as fairly new fans we haven't experienced before.