knockersbumpMKII wrote:Reported for personal abuse, a simple explanation of what was clearly a muddled and ambiguous post was all that it needed.
Warning given for the name calling, however it was clear what Jake meant and you were being pedantic.
No, it simply wasn't clear. Clear would have said Received 2 match ban, 4 games in and 3 players have received bans, it was lazy writing and ambiguous hence why I asked for clarification, that's not being pedantic in the slightest, it's simply asking a poster to clarify what they meant.
Joined: Jun 28 2002 Posts: 11184 Location: Castleford
knockersbumpMKII wrote:No, it simply wasn't clear. Clear would have said Received 2 match ban, 4 games in and 3 players have received bans, it was lazy writing and ambiguous hence why I asked for clarification, that's not being pedantic in the slightest, it's simply asking a poster to clarify what they meant.
Whilst I agree it could've been written better, a simple Google would've given you the answer you were seeking therefore emitting the need for the sarcastic post. Everyone else knew what Jake meant. This constant bickering between you and several others is getting very tedious and if you all can't just ignore each other and crack on, then bans will start to be given.
Black 'n' White's Best Female 2006 & Runner Up 2007 & 2008 "We will not accept a top eight finish as a barometer of supposed success at any point in the future whilst I am the owner of this club", A Pearson 23/09/2011
Brid B&W wrote:4 games into the season and 3 bans handed out
Radford school of tackling. I posted this a couple of weeks ago. Hull need to sort this out sharpish before a) someone gets really hurt and b) it starts to affect your future results (can't believe I just typed that last bit). Ahem, no please, carry on I like the sound of point b.
Gallanteer wrote:Radford school of tackling. I posted this a couple of weeks ago. Hull need to sort this out sharpish before a) someone gets really hurt and b) it starts to affect your future results (can't believe I just typed that last bit). Ahem, no please, carry on I like the sound of point b.
2015 no red cards, four yellow 2016 no red cards, one yellow
Gallanteer wrote:Not many of those this season. You didn't mention how many players and how many games suspensions in previous seasons though.
This is yet another thing that's improved over Radford's tenure to date. Maybe Radford's turning us in to a top 4 club has meant the RFL are more lenient, who knows?
Gallanteer wrote:Not many of those this season. You didn't mention how many players and how many games suspensions in previous seasons though.
Looking at the disciplinary list of charged "hull" players, it's surprising how many rovers players actually crop up. I don't think we come out too badly - Watts, Taylor, Kelly and Paea are in there, and one or two others.
I didn't realise we're now a dirty side - best not go anymore.
Is Hodgson the new Griffin, or is it all about pace?
ccs wrote:Looking at the disciplinary list of charged "hull" players, it's surprising how many rovers players actually crop up. I don't think we come out too badly - Watts, Taylor, Kelly and Paea are in there, and one or two others.
I didn't realise we're now a dirty side - best not go anymore.
But the Rovers Rejects now playing for you are being coached with the Radford tackling technique.
Point taken though, Wigan play dirty and win stuff so why not Hull? I just think you can expect an average of 1 suspension a game until it gets sorted. You'll run out of EGPs and suspensions will be longer. Still.....if it works in terms of league position, bully for you (pun intended).
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 25975 Location: Back in Hull.
Gallanteer wrote:But the Rovers Rejects now playing for you are being coached with the Radford tackling technique.
Point taken though, Wigan play dirty and win stuff so why not Hull? I just think you can expect an average of 1 suspension a game until it gets sorted. You'll run out of EGPs and suspensions will be longer. Still.....if it works in terms of league position, bully for you (pun intended).
Don't talk rubbish, Radford has been in charge for 3 years, in that time we have been pretty good discipline wise, this season we have been a bit dumb that's all, nothing to do with coaching, maybe a bit of over enthusiasm and the will to win.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
