BarnetFC wrote:The TV deal was ridiculous.
BT is finally providing genuine competition for Sky in this country, driving up prices for Rugby Union and Football in particular but also forcing Sky to try and grab onto whatever golf, tennis and F1 it can to maintain the amount of live sport it carries for its increasing subscription. Ideal chance to play companies off on each other. Instead we commit to a multi-year deal for what was a pittance at the time and by the time the deal gets to its final year will look even worse.
I agree to a point but there has been a lot of negatives come out of the BT deal for the champions league, viewing figures are well down and UEFA are losing sponsors due to it. There is a train of thought that although BT was financially the best option, in the long run it has damaged the competition.
The TV deal does on face value seem low but was there a better deal on the table?, can't imagine the broadcasters were queuing with sacks full of cash.
The RFL get a roasting but its a very difficult job I would imagine, errors were made in the distant past that allowed RU to take the mantel as being 'Rugby' and that made us the cousin in the north.
I'll be honest I don't think there is a solution to the problem, raising the cap would make us theoretically able to compete with the NRL but in practice only a couple would be able to afford it and it would go back to the Wigan of the 90's and no one wants that.