FLAT STANLEY wrote:Back on topic More Propaganda Translation: I have no comeback for that hole in the flat earth theory. You do realise, dont you, that anything as big as the earth is impossible to be flat as it would just collpase due to that thing called gravity? Or are you saying that every single scientist who has studied gravity and the earth is on the illuminati's payroll? All hundreds of thousands of them? Regards King James

FLAT STANLEY wrote:Back on topic More Propaganda Translation: I have no comeback for that hole in the flat earth theory. You do realise, dont you, that anything as big as the earth is impossible to be flat as it would just collpase due to that thing called gravity? Or are you saying that every single scientist who has studied gravity and the earth is on the illuminati's payroll? All hundreds of thousands of them? Regards King James

Indoctrination.

Seriously? Are you for real? The whole process of science is to question what people have put before and not to just accept it as the norm. Thats why, you know, any research is put out there to be critiqued by their peers. I give up.

regards

King James

FLAT STANLEY wrote:Back on topic More Propaganda For such an independent news site they're more than happy to roll with the advertising click bait. The whole page is littered with it.

FLAT STANLEY wrote:Back on topic More Propaganda For such an independent news site they're more than happy to roll with the advertising click bait. The whole page is littered with it.

Greer shooting Kennedy really doesn't square with eye-witness testimony. I think it is a smokescreen and not worthy of merit. The same goes for Jackie - although I do think she was mixed up with a bunch of very strange people.

So the killer blow is still a uncertainty, the roadside sewage shooter was in a prime location especially as the motorcade slowed down directly adjacent the sewage opening. I thought the Greer shooting was the most consistent match with the trajectory of the shot, and with Jackie knowing who the killer was made her clamber the vehicle, but i accept your version of witness testimonies very inconclusive case or do i need to delve more, still scratching my head on this one.

Who actually fired the guns is pretty much irrelevant though isn't it. It was a hit sanctioned from within the American establishment and accepting that is more important in helping to understand the world today.

Gee Whizz has someone woke up with a bad hangover this morning.

The JFK case is one of the most compelling cases in history which proves not all conspiracies are theories but conspiracy realists.

With regards to world views fill your boots Sherlock.

Look, he is convinced that all hundreds of thousands of scientists are all wrong, and he knows better. There is nothing whatsoever that you could say to shake his mad conviction 1 mm. It is a waste of time. Any query is either dismissed with insults, or occasionally some garbled insane riposte.

Some moons back, I asked him a simple question - Why does the moon look upside down when viewed from Australia?". I did so in the hope that actually thinking about that rather simple conundrum would help lead him maybe a step away from his blind certainty. For ages, he refused to answer and eventually came up with a puerile example about the word "perspective" and a crescent lamp viewed from opposite ends of a room. A but like those infuriatingly stupid pseudo-science vids he swallows whole, and is so fond of linking to, but a factor or two more risible and pathetic.

And then he blocked me, because even such a simple question is delusionally perceived as some sort of stalking, unfair, attack. It's not. It's a simple question, with no baggage. But his brain can't accept that, the answer doesn't compute but his delusions convince him that cannot be the case, and so it must be the question that is at fault.

If he can't even understand such a simple critique, what is the point of talking about anything with such a person?

I consider the identities of the shooters (as well as their location) irrelevant. They were almost certainly members of William Harvey's clandestine ZR-RIFLE assassination brigade based in Oaxcha Mexico. I seriously doubt whether any of them were drawing breath 48 hours later so it's pointless pursuing the question further. I mean, if you really want to know about bullet trajectories and such the best person to look up is police forensics expert, Sherry Feister who performed a sophisticated "bullet cone" analysis based on the autopsy reports. She recently published an excellent book under the title JFK Enemy of Truth: Myths, Forensics and the Kennedy Assassination

I consider the identities of the shooters (as well as their location) irrelevant. They were almost certainly members of William Harvey's clandestine ZR-RIFLE assassination brigade based in Oaxcha Mexico. I seriously doubt whether any of them were drawing breath 48 hours later so it's pointless pursuing the question further. I mean, if you really want to know about bullet trajectories and such the best person to look up is police forensics expert, Sherry Feister who performed a sophisticated "bullet cone" analysis based on the autopsy reports. She recently published an excellent book under the title JFK Enemy of Truth: Myths, Forensics and the Kennedy Assassination