HA ha here's the picture without the fisheye lens AGAIN HORIZON FLAT and at eye level NUMPTY
In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler
Wow you bring a lot of intellectual conversation the table.
In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler
Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
Dally wrote:Would that apply is Australia was on the bottom-side of a flat Earth of significant mass and the UK on the top-side?
The difficulty in the OP's assertion seems to me to come from what happens around the edges of the flat Earth?
Nah. He linked to many YT videos and one of these had another headcase explaining that the flat round earth, containing all the landmasses we know, is perched on some sort of cone shape, like a kid's top. None of the loonies propose a double-sided flat earth.
The all seem to believe that you can't get to the edge because of the Great Ice Wall. despite planes and satellites having flown over Antarctica millions of times, despite several countries having permanent bases there, despite people on foot having even actually repeatedly walked to the South Pole, it can't be done. because (a) there isn't one, and (b) they couldn't get over the Great Ice Wall, you see. Scott and Amundsen were not great explorers, they were NASA agents sent to bamboozle posterity.
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler
Joined: Feb 17 2002 Posts: 28357 Location: MACS0647-JD
theearthisflat wrote:HA ha here's the picture without the fisheye lens AGAIN HORIZON FLAT and at eye level NUMPTY
OMG you really are mad, aren't you? You post, as "evidence", the Red Bull Stratos/Aix Sponza German entry in the "Best Visualisation" category of the Animago Awards 2013! http://www.animago.com/en/hall-of-fame/ ... ries-2013/
]The animago Award is a competition that honours outstanding international work in the fields of 3D Animation & Still, Visual Effects and Visualisation.]
Don't you get tired of heaping this sort of humiliation on your own head?
Now, why is it that the moon looks "upside down" when viewed from Australia?
This one must be hard for you, given your conspicuous refusal to explain, but i'm a generous-spirited sort of guy so here's a link to a page of Woodlands Junior School in Kent, which will take you through the basics. http://resources.woodlands-junior.kent. ... heres.html
theearthisflat wrote:HA ha here's the picture without the fisheye lens AGAIN HORIZON FLAT and at eye level NUMPTY
OMG you really are mad, aren't you? You post, as "evidence", the Red Bull Stratos/Aix Sponza German entry in the "Best Visualisation" category of the Animago Awards 2013! http://www.animago.com/en/hall-of-fame/ ... ries-2013/
]The animago Award is a competition that honours outstanding international work in the fields of 3D Animation & Still, Visual Effects and Visualisation.]
Don't you get tired of heaping this sort of humiliation on your own head?
Now, why is it that the moon looks "upside down" when viewed from Australia?
This one must be hard for you, given your conspicuous refusal to explain, but i'm a generous-spirited sort of guy so here's a link to a page of Woodlands Junior School in Kent, which will take you through the basics. http://resources.woodlands-junior.kent. ... heres.html
Last edited by Ferocious Aardvark on stardate Jun 26, 3013 11:27 am, edited 48,562,867,458,300,023 times in total
Ha ha 8 v 1 and not one person can prove the globe. Why's that? Because it's just a THEORY.
In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler
Also, if we were on a flat 'disk', wouldn't northern Russia, Europe and America then be in the centre and therefore the hottest? Would there even be an equator? Would North exist?
Cup Winners: 1914, 1982, 2005, 2016, 2017. Cup Runners-Up: 1908, 1909, 1910, 1922, 1923, 1959, 1960, 1980, 1983, 1985, 2008, 2013. League Champions: 1920, 1921, 1936, 1956, 1958, 1983. League Runners-Up: 1957, 1982, 1984, 2006.
Have you ever heard that light can bend? You know like from one medium to another of different density? It's perfectly possible given the right conditions in air of differing densities for light to bend around curves. That's your experiment mate ... bent! Refraction.
theearthisflat wrote:Scientific evidence The Bedfordshire level experiment
Have you ever heard that light can bend? You know like from one medium to another of different density? It's perfectly possible given the right conditions in air of differing densities for light to bend around curves. That's your experiment mate ... bent! Refraction.
War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
