Dave K. wrote:I'll ask again, do you think you have seen enough of Cunningham to write him off?

So far this year he has played 6 games (Usually one 20 minute spell) and made 22 carries, surely that isn't enough to make a judgement?

I thought he has done pretty well in the brief minutes he has played and should be given more gametime to prove his worth.

Dave K. wrote:I'll ask again, do you think you have seen enough of Cunningham to write him off?

So far this year he has played 6 games (Usually one 20 minute spell) and made 22 carries, surely that isn't enough to make a judgement?

I thought he has done pretty well in the brief minutes he has played and should be given more gametime to prove his worth.

The Major wrote:who's wrote him off? All I've said which is my opinion is that he's average. You think he's pretty well which is your opinion, why can't you just accepted it

Dave K. wrote:You still haven't answered the question?

You put a statement out there saying he is average, so that's pretty much saying he isn't good enough.which have I seen enough of him, yes I have seen enough of him imo his average, I never said he wasn't good enough, I said he was average. Challenge me all you like you won't bully me into changing my mind Cunno would have been better off staying at London to gain further experience

No problem with your opinion, but this is a forum, so prepare to be challenged.

easthull fc fan wrote:He does need more time before he can be judged, we need to not rely on Houghton all the time imo.

weaver93 wrote:I agree, I'd like to see both hookers rotated better.

For example, start Cunningham, then bring Houghton on ,when our defence starts to tire.

easthull fc fan wrote:We need to although Houghton runs his blood to water for FC, he becomes lathargic & distributes some sloppy play.

knockersbumpMKII wrote:Exactly this, this is why I've being disappointed that Cunningham hasn't had more game time. Taking not only pressure off Houghton a bit but pepping up the attack AND defence when Houghton starts to flag. It also allows Cunningham to develop, to show us what he's about, I'm sure he'd like to be in the 17 more regularly so will have something to prove which can't be a bad thing.

knockersbumpMKII wrote:Exactly this, this is why I've being disappointed that Cunningham hasn't had more game time. Taking not only pressure off Houghton a bit but pepping up the attack AND defence when Houghton starts to flag. It also allows Cunningham to develop, to show us what he's about, I'm sure he'd like to be in the 17 more regularly so will have something to prove which can't be a bad thing.