Mrs Barista wrote:It's saying our players out injured would choose to play if we were doing better. What interpretation is needed other than deception is afoot?
No, it actually doesn't, really. Especially when followed up with this:
Sebasteeno wrote:You really are sad. You know what i meant - In all sport when a team is playing well players want to be part of it but when the chips are down players may not rush back as quickly as they might of done. Thats all i was saying. To try and shape it into your sad little agenda is rather pathetic and epitomises whats wrong with this sad little board run by mrs queen bee know nothing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc08a/cc08a330764d0b3189a7e36a7e0682900aa59a0e" alt="CRAZY :CRAZY:"
It says that if we were doing well, perhaps some players may work harder to regain fitness more quickly, or maybe even try to declare themselves fit to play slightly earlier than they should.
Absolutely nowhere can I see it mentioned in one of Sebasteeno's posts:
Mrs Barista wrote:That players are match fit but lying to avoid playing?
Mrs Barista wrote:Jordan Thompson and Sa [are] deliberately sacking it off when fit to play.
Mrs Barista wrote:deliberate deception and breaching contract terms by feigning inability to work
Mrs Barista wrote:accusing injured members of the squad of deliberately exaggerating injuries to avoid taking the field
I'm not familiar with this style of posting, have I included enough quotes?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cdf3/7cdf3828d0d7ad1336de78452f10fde8c0bcbe85" alt="Wink :wink:"