i never once said it would have nothing to do with the debt, that amount of debt would hinder anybody, point is it happened, it was out of fans hands, then we suffer the consequences when it all goes to shiz. i for one would not bang on about it.

Strange.

Your view is very different to fans who used to have season tickets at OT.

No!! that was Shanks! He built this wonderful club up, of course

That's all well and good if De Jong is up against another strong midfielder. If they're going into a 50/50 ball then it's okay to say the other player needs to compete to win the ball.

But what about the rest of the time when the other player is dribbling with the ball, beating another player, off-balance or looking to play a pass upfield? Has the rest of football got to stop playing simply to allow De Jong to throw himself about?

right well ill put it this way should De Jong stop winning challenges just so people get chance to go round him?? get a grip its football thereis always going to b contact and inevatably there will be injurys. Every player goes onto the pitch knowing theres chance of injury but you still give it 100% commitment. I played rugby and football since i was 6 (im 20 now) giving it my all flying in and getting smashed dirtily and legally but onlyever had 1 bad injury Ben Arfa was unlucky thats all

I'm with you mate, some people just won't have it.

De Jong is clearly a f-cking hitman.

Not going to gloat about LFC as it could be us in a couple of years, especially when Ferguson/Giggs/Scholes call it a day.

Hope they don't get too giddy about the new owners however as we heard all this stadium/signings talk when the current owners took over.

They'll probably just keep their anti American banners in a safe in place incase they need them again with a year or so.

Suppose thats the only positive of a new set of Americans taking over.