hkrdavidhkr wrote:it wasn`t a try, he hit the corner flag first before the grounding, bentham saw this or got the call from the touch judge and then pulled it back for the offside in the build up for it.
Actually he gave a forward pass, didn't see the grounding so can't comment. First offence was Rovers off side
If you are interested in Building Information Modelling (BIM). PM me.
Mrs Barista wrote:You do keep very very similar times to another key poster on here. Odd, but I can understand why it would look bad for your alter ego to post in this fashion.
I don't see why you are reporting this as "news" to me? I've been very clear on here for ages that Rovers would win yesterday. Rovers will be stronger for sure next year. But the context I guess is that you were 7th and beat a team in 6th that has beaten you twice this year and finished above you after the regular rounds. Hudgell promised you would be challenging for silverware by 2009, which presumably means getting to a final as it's difficult to challenge without doing that. I know Vella has said you will win the competition this season in the HDM, but do you think you should consider that Warrington, Wigan, Saints, Leeds and Huddersfield might not just roll over as easily as we did? Being the best team in Hull is a bit like qualifying for an Olympic final as a fastest loser. Important for bragging rights etc, but does it make you a genuine contender when your opponents are so poor? I'm not entirely sure.
We are 2 matches away from Old Trafford in decent form so I'd say we are contenders.
Anyway, don't you think we played well last night considering we had a large proportion of our salary cap missing?
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
General Zod. wrote:We are 2 matches away from Old Trafford in decent form so I'd say we are contenders.
You've won one play-off game against Hull FC, and in the previous play-off format wouldn't even have qualified for the play-offs. If you think that on its own makes you genuine title contenders, you're in cloud cuckoo land. Win at Wigan or Warrington next week, then it's a more realistic prospect.
General Zod. wrote:Anyway, don't you think we played well last night considering we had a large proportion of our salary cap missing?
I think you're not playing with the full deck, son. Try reading the OP.
Gosh, you're busy today. I've not seen you this active since you posted 150 times in 48 hours slating Tom Briscoe last season.
Mrs Barista wrote:You've won one play-off game against Hull FC, and in the previous play-off format wouldn't even have qualified for the play-offs. If you think that on its own makes you genuine title contenders, you're in cloud cuckoo land. Win at Wigan or Warrington next week, then it's a more realistic prospect.
I think you're not playing with the full deck, son. Try reading the OP.
Gosh, you're busy today. I've not seen you this active since you posted 150 times in 48 hours slating Tom Briscoe last season.
We're still in the comp which makes us contenders at this stage and I'd say we have done very well considering our "injuries".
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Captain Dave wrote:Mrs B , you must have a lot of time on your hands or be good at multi-tasking if you can be bothered to look for posters' alter egos.
Not really. A couple of phrases used by His Bobness reminded me a of another poster on here who really should know better and clicking on "search users posts" for each, the first 15 posts were pretty much a full match in terms of timings. Unusual times as well which makes it all the more likely to be the same person. As said, I could understand why posting in the style of His Bobness wouldn't be a great idea for the other poster.
Mrs Barista wrote:Not really. A couple of phrases used by His Bobness reminded me a of another poster on here who really should know better and clicking on "search users posts" for each, the first 15 posts were pretty much a full match in terms of timings. Unusual times as well which makes it all the more likely to be the same person. As said, I could understand why posting in the style of His Bobness wouldn't be a great idea for the other poster.
I assume your inferring myself to be "His Bobness" - well you are wrong and any Mod who could take the time to check the I.P. addresses would validate that.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
General Zod. wrote:We're still in the comp which makes us contenders at this stage and I'd say we have done very well considering our "injuries".
You have done well to say you've been paying Cooke and Mills and they've not even played. But beating a team whose club you say is tin-pot from top to bottom and predicted wouldn't even make the play-offs is one thing. Genuinely contending for the trophy is another. Like I said, come back next week when you've beaten Wigan or Warrington away and you're in the last 4, and we'll assess your GF eliminator prospects and consequently how genuine your chance is on getting your hands on the trophy as Vella has already categorically said you will.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
