Post subject: Re: Should the 4 Nations Tournament be scrapped?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:44 am
Ant80
International Star
Joined: Aug 03 2010 Posts: 576
The Observer wrote:An international side versus a club team on tour would be much more appealing to a lot of people than the WCC. I used to watch the WCC with excitement, but ultimately, it doesn't mean very much to most Australians. An expanded WCC certainly would not. Also, it would undermine the finals series and Grand Finals of both nations - unless it was run roughly like soccer's WCC, which uses the champions only from each country. We'd need to add the Catalans, Crusaders and Warriors just to fill out numbers, and if those teams hadn't performed well in NRL/SL, it could undermine the concept.
Rugby Union successfully stages Lions tours, where the Lions play midweek tour games against clubs in front of good crowds. The Wallabies, All Blacks and Springboks have all played tour games in recent years against British or Irish clubs, in front of excellent crowds. The Wallabies played and defeated: * Gloucester 17-5 at Kingsholm Ground Crowd; 16,500 (capacity). Tuesday November 3rd, 2009. * Cardiff Blues 31-3 at Cardiff City Soccer Stadium. Crowd 14,622 (capacity is 26,828). Tuesday November 24, 2009. This year, the Wallabies will play Irish provincial team Munster and English Premiers Leicester Tigers.
South Africa payed and lost to * Leicester Tigers at a sold-out Welford Road Stadium, crowd 24,000. Leicester won 22-17 (the video shows how passionate the Leicester club fans during the game and when they won). Friday November 6th, 2009. * Saracens at Wembley, crowd 46,281 (capacity 90,000). Saracens won 24-23 (the other video doesn't have the crowd noise, but features a performance review by Andy Farrell, ironically)
New Zealand's All Blacks played Munster to a capacity 26,500 crowd at a redeveloped Thomond Park, Tuesday November 18, the mid week ABs winning narrowly. Tell me the electric atmosphere of this game wouldn't be good for RL: Munster vs All Blacks - Electric Atmosphere, Hakas and Tries
A few of the Manly guy's that went on the 2009 WCC tour absolutley loved it, conversing with the locals in Leeds.It's up to the Australiasian club's to make a big deal out off it like Manly and the Roosters did.
From memory 40 Manly fans went over there to the UK and the next one I'd think will get close to 100. I'm hoping to be 1 of them
The Observer wrote:An international side versus a club team on tour would be much more appealing to a lot of people than the WCC. I used to watch the WCC with excitement, but ultimately, it doesn't mean very much to most Australians. An expanded WCC certainly would not. Also, it would undermine the finals series and Grand Finals of both nations - unless it was run roughly like soccer's WCC, which uses the champions only from each country. We'd need to add the Catalans, Crusaders and Warriors just to fill out numbers, and if those teams hadn't performed well in NRL/SL, it could undermine the concept.
Rugby Union successfully stages Lions tours, where the Lions play midweek tour games against clubs in front of good crowds. The Wallabies, All Blacks and Springboks have all played tour games in recent years against British or Irish clubs, in front of excellent crowds. The Wallabies played and defeated: * Gloucester 17-5 at Kingsholm Ground Crowd; 16,500 (capacity). Tuesday November 3rd, 2009. * Cardiff Blues 31-3 at Cardiff City Soccer Stadium. Crowd 14,622 (capacity is 26,828). Tuesday November 24, 2009. This year, the Wallabies will play Irish provincial team Munster and English Premiers Leicester Tigers.
South Africa payed and lost to * Leicester Tigers at a sold-out Welford Road Stadium, crowd 24,000. Leicester won 22-17 (the video shows how passionate the Leicester club fans during the game and when they won). Friday November 6th, 2009. * Saracens at Wembley, crowd 46,281 (capacity 90,000). Saracens won 24-23 (the other video doesn't have the crowd noise, but features a performance review by Andy Farrell, ironically)
New Zealand's All Blacks played Munster to a capacity 26,500 crowd at a redeveloped Thomond Park, Tuesday November 18, the mid week ABs winning narrowly. Tell me the electric atmosphere of this game wouldn't be good for RL: Munster vs All Blacks - Electric Atmosphere, Hakas and Tries
A few of the Manly guy's that went on the 2009 WCC tour absolutley loved it, conversing with the locals in Leeds.It's up to the Australiasian club's to make a big deal out off it like Manly and the Roosters did.
From memory 40 Manly fans went over there to the UK and the next one I'd think will get close to 100. I'm hoping to be 1 of them
Post subject: Re: Should the 4 Nations Tournament be scrapped?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 6:47 am
roughyedspud
Club Coach
Joined: Apr 07 2005 Posts: 7814 Location: oldham
The Observer wrote:.
Firstly, England should already have built up the hype over three years of 4Ns & June test. English fans already know the team exists. RL people already know a World Cup will be held in 2013. There'll be a June test in 2012 and 2013 to help build hype anyway.
what does 17 englishmen,in GB shirts, beating NZ in a 3 game series,do to build up the hype for the 2013 world cup??....england beating NZ on the other hand lays down a marker...GB has no relavence in the current international league structure...
The Observer wrote:.Secondly, as for building the hype of Scotland, Wales and Ireland - how will an England series do that? it won't! How will a GB tour negatively affect the Celts? It won't. The Celts will only get a repeat of this year's European Championship, 3 games, regardless of whether England or GB toured.
firstly...take ireland off that list...they want nothing to do with GB
secondly....in the unlikey senario that wales or scotland produce a talent good enough to displace 1 of the 17 englishmen that would make up a GB team in the next couple of years,then this lad will be wrenched from the welsh or scottish sides while these side are trying to develop their own sides..
GB will only be worth bringing back when the welsh and scottish start producing players good enough to warrant GB selection....like i keep saying...if theres 17 englishmen on the field...play as england cos thats what they are..
Post subject: Re: Should the 4 Nations Tournament be scrapped?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:01 am
The Observer
International Chairman
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 1016 Location: Sydney, Australia
roughyedspud wrote:GB won't be touring so all that was a waste of time mate......looks good though...we could give it a crack in 2025
Haha true, it was. If England do tour in 07, would be good to see a couple of tour games like the Warriors and the Maori. The Maori always present a strong challenge, the Warriors and England would still attract a strong crowd and play a strong game without their frontline test stars.
roughyedspud wrote:union players have the energy to play tour games against club sides because they spend 80% of the game laying on the ground...
Well that was Lote Tuqiri who dived out of play to win the game for Leicester Seriously though, the Roos would have played clubs in 2001 were it not for the scare after 9/11. On a Tueday night in October 2002, the Kiwis attracted a good crowd over 12K at the Boulevard against Hull - good effort really.
Post subject: Re: Should the 4 Nations Tournament be scrapped?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:26 am
The Observer
International Chairman
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 1016 Location: Sydney, Australia
roughyedspud wrote:what does 17 englishmen,in GB shirts, beating NZ in a 3 game series,do to build up the hype for the 2013 world cup??....england beating NZ on the other hand lays down a marker...GB has no relavence in the current international league structure...
If NZ beats England 3 nil, that's a pretty awful marker then!
Quote:firstly...take ireland off that list...they want nothing to do with GB
OK, but have Northern Irish people suddenly left the Union?
Quote:secondly....in the unlikey senario that wales or scotland produce a talent good enough to displace 1 of the 17 englishmen that would make up a GB team in the next couple of years,then this lad will be wrenched from the welsh or scottish sides while these side are trying to develop their own sides..
Again, as I showed above, not true. Welsh and Scottish reps won't have to miss any games for their team.
Quote:GB will only be worth bringing back when the welsh and scottish start producing players good enough to warrant GB selection
How many Welsh/Scottish need to be in the team until it can be called GB? What number, and what percentage of the team should they make up? What about players from the midlands, the south, London? As I said, it never seem to matter that there were no Welsh, Scottish players in the GB team for decades before, so it hasn't suddenly changed.
Quote:....like i keep saying...if theres 17 englishmen on the field...play as england cos thats what they are..
By that logic, since there are 17 Northerners in the team, play as Northern England. The rest of the country, the sports press, and Rugby Union people, regard the England RL team as a Northern team. By your logic above, once you start to get a consistent number of international class players from the midlands, the south, London, then play as England.
roughyedspud wrote:what does 17 englishmen,in GB shirts, beating NZ in a 3 game series,do to build up the hype for the 2013 world cup??....england beating NZ on the other hand lays down a marker...GB has no relavence in the current international league structure...
If NZ beats England 3 nil, that's a pretty awful marker then!
Quote:firstly...take ireland off that list...they want nothing to do with GB
OK, but have Northern Irish people suddenly left the Union?
Quote:secondly....in the unlikey senario that wales or scotland produce a talent good enough to displace 1 of the 17 englishmen that would make up a GB team in the next couple of years,then this lad will be wrenched from the welsh or scottish sides while these side are trying to develop their own sides..
Again, as I showed above, not true. Welsh and Scottish reps won't have to miss any games for their team.
Quote:GB will only be worth bringing back when the welsh and scottish start producing players good enough to warrant GB selection
How many Welsh/Scottish need to be in the team until it can be called GB? What number, and what percentage of the team should they make up? What about players from the midlands, the south, London? As I said, it never seem to matter that there were no Welsh, Scottish players in the GB team for decades before, so it hasn't suddenly changed.
Quote:....like i keep saying...if theres 17 englishmen on the field...play as england cos thats what they are..
By that logic, since there are 17 Northerners in the team, play as Northern England. The rest of the country, the sports press, and Rugby Union people, regard the England RL team as a Northern team. By your logic above, once you start to get a consistent number of international class players from the midlands, the south, London, then play as England.
Post subject: Re: Should the 4 Nations Tournament be scrapped?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 4:36 pm
Wellsy13
Club Owner
Joined: Feb 03 2004 Posts: 10000 Location: Hull
The Observer wrote:Haha true, it was. If England do tour in 07, would be good to see a couple of tour games like the Warriors and the Maori. The Maori always present a strong challenge, the Warriors and England would still attract a strong crowd and play a strong game without their frontline test stars.
I wouldn't like to see them play the Warriors. I don't even like the fact that they're called the NZ Warriors. It affects the Kiwi brand IMO. Same reason why I disagreed with everyone that wanted to call the Crusaders "Wales Crusaders" or whatever. International tours should play international teams and build up representative rugby.
The Observer wrote:Well that was Lote Tuqiri who dived out of play to win the game for Leicester Seriously though, the Roos would have played clubs in 2001 were it not for the scare after 9/11. On a Tueday night in October 2002, the Kiwis attracted a good crowd over 12K at the Boulevard against Hull - good effort really.
It got 12k because it was the last ever Hull FC game at the Boulevard. They could have played Cottingham Tigers and got the same crowd. I see you conveniently missed out the 5,612 that packed out Knowsley Road to watch NZ take on the SL Champions...
Post subject: Re: Should the 4 Nations Tournament be scrapped?
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:14 am
Jonesy
Player Coach
Joined: Jun 23 2008 Posts: 1213
Wellsy, I cant do it like you do where you quote every sentence that suits you and come up with half a reply.
I will say this Thorman played 11 games for Parramatta 5 years ago. Mathers was an up and coming superstar in SL and played 4-5 games for the Titans Tansey was the most bizarre signing of all but did ok for the Newtown Jets with a couple of games in the NRL.
What is the common theme of the players mentioned above? They were paid pretty well match payments and no Australians had heard of them.
In Contrast... Some old busted ar*e Aussie or never has been Aussie comes to SL in massive numbers and its the second coming of Christ by the fans. How many Aussies or Kiwis in SL this year again?
Ellis is on less than he would get in England, Burgess could be anything depending on Crowes involvement.
How much did YOU pay for Berro? in his twilight years 31 now, or Fitz at 33 hardly in their prime are they?
I will let this thread die here from my part Wellsy. They say Knowlsley Road is closing soon, have you been in all four sides of that ground? if not you will need to go there soon for the last game and move around a bit.
Post subject: Re: Should the 4 Nations Tournament be scrapped?
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:26 pm
The Observer
International Chairman
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 1016 Location: Sydney, Australia
Wellsy13 wrote:I wouldn't like to see them play the Warriors. International tours should play international teams and build up representative rugby.
There's a place for both. Tour games can be more competitive, generate more revenue, be logistically easier to plan and run, and be more meaningful to established RL communities than certain test matches, e.g. Big 3 tests against certain emerging nations.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 54 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Seriously though, the Roos would have played clubs in 2001 were it not for the scare after 9/11. On a Tueday night in October 2002, the Kiwis attracted a good crowd over 12K at the Boulevard against Hull - good effort really.
_zps67e534e4.jpg)
