Fisher is not a SL quality player, it was a mistake giving him a long extension IMO, w need a hooker with higher abilities as first choice, which will also help with Hodgsons development as a back up hooker.

Fisher would be a great top end NL1 hooker, no more.

Whilst I agree that we need a better hooker at the club, at least Fisher is exactly that; where as L Hanson is what exactly?

Disagree Fisher is a excellent Hooker, if Morgan drops players lacking form, why were Dobson and Fox playing

morgan is like a petulant child. Everyone knows he has his favourites. only surprise with fisher is that he has an aussie accent

I'm right though, aren't I?

You're the one that put a question mark there, that tells me enough.

Slightly O/T but in hindsight would you have been better signing up Kirk Netherton and letting Morgan develop him than signing up Fisher until end 2011? I've not followed his progress at Cas, but he's played 25 games for them, plus homegrown obviously.

That I didn't sneak out of English lessons?

Gotta say I actually agree. He clearly does, e.g. Newton or Galea could have an absolute nightmare for a few games but their spots are always guaranteed.
Not knocking Justin because he's had a lot more hits then misses at Rovers, but he def made mistakes last weekend.
IMO Fisher certainly is an SL-level hooker, and might have made a difference, esp when scores were so close 2nd half.