Catalancs wrote:good luck fella. now what do you reckon to brian noble at wigan?

Red Hot Jalapeno wrote:Not at all Jonh. My reaction to the Bradford win was because you and others had gone on and on that Noble did not have a clue how to coach anything other than 5 drives and a kick. Unfortunately you changed your argument after that win to the consistency one. If you want to keep blaming Noble when we lose you have to be prepared to take the flak back when we win.

As you say i will fight to the end for Noble not because i dont want to be proven wrong but because i believe he is a good coach. You obviously think hes a poor coach and have stated in the past he won things with Bradford by luck. Just because you dont agree with my thoughts does not mean i should change my opinion to suit yours. If we all agreed on everything then forums like this would be pointless.

Pemps wrote:But surely a bit of consistency and some entertaining rugby isn't too much to ask for?

stusavage wrote:No it isnt, i'd rather play pretty and lose and more to the point get value for money. Noble's style is all about a tight six in defense around the play the ball and biff n bash on attack. If Feka and Hock can not run over them or Tommy side steps through where knackered. I hope they prove me wrong against Saints (God i hope they do). Leeds and Saints make a lot of handling errors in their games because they keep the ball alive especially in their own half believe it or not. We need to use the multi-tude of backs we have to good effect as we are thin on the grounds with forwards.

BOYD2 wrote:Message for Alex ,and there were only Giants that got the Points .

BOYD2 wrote:Alex why lock the thread,it was still been disscused if you read the RFLs summary of the fight you will see that they said that there were 3 Wigan players on to one and Mason went to help him.