Joined: Mar 30 2008 Posts: 82 Location: Out Of Town
LeedsPokerGuru wrote:Honestly I think the guy is a decent coach. I would like to see the club show patience but a club with wigans track record I would not be blown away should they part company in the next few weeks(results permitting).
As poor as wigan were tonight I think the coach needs time to ship certain players out or new coach brought in for the good of the comp.
We weren't great out wide tonight but you were soft up the middle. Would you get rid or give him time to clear out a few players???
A little bird tells me connected to an advisor of your club that Shaun Edwards has already been sounded out, but has rejected it due to being on a good screw with the rah-rahs ..... But one name that is certainly in the frame is the return of the prodigal son from Union .... ANDY FARRELL !
"Now, I bet you don't know what this was used for ..."
Jack Hargreaves wrote:A little bird tells me connected to an advisor of your club that Shaun Edwards has already been sounded out, but has rejected it due to being on a good screw with the rah-rahs ..... But one name that is certainly in the frame is the return of the prodigal son from Union .... ANDY FARRELL !
This the same Andy Farrell who has allegedly just signed a 3 year coaching deal with Saracens?
The Communist Cap - dragging down success and aspiration to the levels of those who cba.
tbh sounds daft but we werent all that far off against leeds....they were just white hot for the first 30 mins....they would have posted all but one of those first tries on saints IMO and been 18 nil up against them. You cant really legislate for 2 freek 40-20s like they had.
We still have a good squad and a team capable of challenging if we get the selections right, as brian carney said on sky, dont write us off yet.
For me id go with much of the same for salford. Feka needs to start on the bench though for impact, fielden should be dropped at least to the bench if not completely for prescott, and I would bring in mossop for hock.
IMO that team should be well capable of putting 50 on salford.....30 on huddersfield, and building a bit of a momentum for sintellins.
Last edited by andyed-wiganrl on Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Joined: Mar 30 2004 Posts: 7779 Location: Sorting my Erection out & Helping Conroy With his!
andyed-wiganrl wrote:tbh sounds daft but we werent all that far off against leeds....they were just white hot for the first 30 mins....they would have posted all but one of those first tries on saints IMO and been 18 nil up against them. You cant really legislate for 2 freek 40-20s like they had.
We still have a good squad and a team capable of challenging if we get the selections right, as brian carney said on sky, dont write us off yet.
For me id go with much of the same for salford. Feka needs to start on the bench though for impact, fielden should be dropped at least to the bench if not completely for prescott, and I would bring in mossop for hock.
IMO that team should be well capable of putting 50 on salford.....30 on huddersfield, and building a bit of a momentum for sintellins.
Are You?
ON GLUE!
Fans Forum 28.08.08 Fan from Haydock
"I've got one word for you Mr Chairman - Penalty Count"
[quote="The Daddy"]I've got one word for you all......Steve Hanley[/quote]
Some Salford fan said to me and I quote "You are by far and away the most Handsome & Knowledgeable Rugby League Fan in England!"
I thanked him and went on my Merry way!
RIVERCAVE DWELLER OF THE YEAR 2015!
"The club used you last night and didn't tell the truth."
Joined: Mar 19 2004 Posts: 652 Location: Living Room!
andyed-wiganrl wrote:tbh sounds daft but we werent all that far off against leeds....they were just white hot for the first 30 mins....they would have posted all but one of those first tries on saints IMO and been 18 nil up against them. You cant really legislate for 2 freek 40-20s like they had.
We still have a good squad and a team capable of challenging if we get the selections right, as brian carney said on sky, dont write us off yet.
For me id go with much of the same for salford. Feka needs to start on the bench though for impact, fielden should be dropped at least to the bench if not completely for prescott, and I would bring in mossop for hock.
IMO that team should be well capable of putting 50 on salford.....30 on huddersfield, and building a bit of a momentum for sintellins.
I agree with this... Leeds were due a performance like that, I'm pretty sure that's where they were trying to be 2 weeks ago, we caught the backlash... not panick time by any means, Leeds will stick a lot of points on a lot of teams playing like this (they've done it to Saints in the last 2 GF's!)
“The price of success is hard work, dedication to the job at hand, and the determination that whether we win or lose, we have applied the best of ourselves to the task at hand.”
“If you can accept losing, you can't win.”
“Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence.”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 296 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum