TURFEDOUT wrote:and if you do, how would you counter the argument that Wakefield simply arent a sustainable SL entity?
My point refers to the above.
Where you question the sustainability of Wakefield.
i dont question it, unless things change i dont think they are a sustainable SL entity,
they may be able to rely on antipodeans and other SL clubs right now but that wont last forever, probably not even another 10 years
Quote:Just out of interest,why is the amount of Antipodeans detrimental to the sustainability of the league as a whole??
I can see it is a problem for the national team,but not for the league as a whole.
suppose if Leeds, Saints, Bradford, Hull, wigan et al decided to take the same approach, suppose they all said sod the rest of em, we are looking after number one,
suppose Paul Caddick, Ian Lenegan, Peter Hood, Kath Hetherington, Eammon McMannus got together and said, Why on earth should we continue to spend thousands of pounds on youth development systems, only to lose players to teams that havent because of the SC,
Suppose they decided it would be cheaper and easier to simply bring over ready made players from Australia like Wakefield do, so they stop bringing youth through which means other clubs cant pick up the scraps anymore, so they have to bring even more overseas players in, and because there are so many to fit under the cap, the quality of those brought in falls, the quality of the league falls, it loses touch with its market, no longer provides a pathway for amateurs, and we simply become a 2nd tier of the NRL
who wants to watch 2nd tier rugby, well as the championship proves, not many people, so some clubs go to the wall, those that dont slash their player budgets, which means an even worse quality of player is brought in and we then have a league full of frank Wintersteins, and again, nobody wants to watch that so everything spirals until the game dies