Joined: Jan 29 2007 Posts: 5695 Location: Wigan, unfortunately.
Selecting Swann has payed off with 5 wickets. IMO they should have enforced the follow on because if England bowl like they do again they'd have it won by the end of the 4th day.
No1_Saints _Fan wrote:Selecting Swann has payed off with 5 wickets. IMO they should have enforced the follow on because if England bowl like they do again they'd have it won by the end of the 4th day.
The bowlers were knackered. They need a couple of sessions rest then they'll be refreshed, sending them straight back into the field in those temperatures would have been a foolish move.
Joined: Apr 03 2003 Posts: 28186 Location: A world of my own ...
Smiggs wrote:The bowlers were knackered. They need a couple of sessions rest then they'll be refreshed, sending them straight back into the field in those temperatures would have been a foolish move.
Flintoff was struggling with injury, Harmison with "illness" - although why a player who was supposedly suffering from heatstroke spent so much of the day in the field if he wasn't fit to bowl I don't know.
The counter argument to that is there were only 11 overs to bowl after the break between innings. Broad, Anderson and Swann could have covered those between them leaving the other two to get a nights rest and come back fresh in the morning.
"As you travel through life don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things" - George Carlin
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum