Bullpower wrote::roll: . . . and that will help us how exactly?

And before you go off on a little rant I'm:-

NOT defending SM.

NOT having a pop at you, rather your post.

NOT condoning how we're playing.

NOT one of those half naked "lady friends" on your sig link.

NOT happy about being where we are in the table.

NOT Mystic Eddie . . .. .

. . . . I simply subscribe to the old adage that if you fail to plan, you plan to fail. . . . and we CAN fail far more than we are doing at the moment.

. . . . . . . . IMO (and that's all it is) doing what you suggest would put us even more firmly on that road . . . . . .

af wrote:No one seems to think it is a good thing.

redeverready wrote:But how much longer can this go on before something has to be done. All of next season the season after.

Hutchie wrote:Who would you have in his place ??

jsb1990 wrote:Agreed McNamara needs to go and so to does Peter Hood !

Bully_Boxer wrote:Right and you know somebody who is willing to invest their time and efforts and has the abilities to run a SL club do you? I am sure Hood would gladly hand over the reigns if your replacement has the funds to take the club further than he could.

Jesus we have some nobs on here.

Bully_Boxer wrote:Right and you know somebody who is willing to invest their time and efforts and has the abilities to run a SL club do you? I am sure Hood would gladly hand over the reigns if your replacement has the funds to take the club further than he could.

Jesus we have some nobs on here.