Hasbag wrote:Just pure stupidity. I can forgive his sending off against Rovers. Went for a big hit to shut down a play and just got it wrong. But on Thursday there was absolutely no need to swing an arm like that, there was only about 30 seconds left on the clock.

fun time frankie wrote:Timely boosts eh Mrs B and it's only Monday

Jake the Peg wrote:2 bans and 2 concussions and he's only been here less than 1/2 a season. Let's hope he settles down or he won't be worth having around

Hasbag wrote:He looks really good when he strings a few games together. It just rarely happens

Mick Cranes Sidestep wrote:If Hock got one with his past, Griffin is comparatively holy by comparison. 1 match for Hock says its Grade A. Previous 12 months is the mitigating factor and Griffin has none - this means lower end of penalties and Grade A is 0-1 match.

The Phantom Horseman wrote:Griffin had been cited six times in the last 12 months, and banned once.
Hock had not been cited a single time in the last 12 months.

WIZEB wrote:I'd love you to tell us the playing minutes on the park of the pair of them over the last 12 months?

ccs wrote:Being cited means nothing if you're not charged.

The Phantom Horseman wrote:Sure, if you can show me where it says in the RFL rules that that is of any relevance in the decision-making process?