What a (very) strange and worrying interpretation.



If all passholders attend there will be no income from the games, if no passholders attend then those that go will have had to pay (like walkups).

That made me laugh for sitting at the end of a row in east Stand central seemed like a really good idea when I queued at the Boulevard for my seats but there are a few in our row who have that issue and the thought of them going by face to face all those times is a bit off putting at present. I guess anyway with social distancing we will all be spread out around the stadium but there will be people who still don't feel safe going at first anyway. It would be useful to know how many seasons sales we have got at present as well. Incidentally I read it as 6000 if we were able to open the whole stadium, but in fairness to that discussion different people in Government seem to have different interpretations of it and then there are always the Allams unique user agreement pricing policy to deal with as well. No doubt the club will be thinking about this as we talk and we'll get some sort of indication soon.

I understand your thinking, but if no structure is in place before limited attendance fixtures, and your hoping for cash paying customers, the club would be at risk of losing the patronage of its most valued members in the future, who have already committed payments.



I suppose they could allow 3000 pass holders, and sell 3000 tickets, Unprecedented circumstances.

I'm not suggesting passholders should be limited, far from it, all I'm saying is the club will lose money if only passholders attend.



Hardly rocket science.



No way will the club sell tickets and prevent passholders from attending.

Oh I see, so your saying pass holders should “for the good of the club” give up their seats for paying customers.

Where did I ever say that?



Crazy.

I probably misunderstood your reply earlier to Armavinit,



If all pass holders attend, no income, if walk ups attend then income.



Not crazy, just misinterpreted.

Its only limited numbers for a month anyway isnt it? June 21st everything 'should' be back to normal according the governments plan

Surely the income is already paid in from members, that money is helping to prop the club up in advance of actual games. That's part of the reward of getting discounted tickets, like buying in bulk at a retailer, you benefit from a lower per item price by buying all the product in one go and before you use them.



So members whom have paid in advance absolutely should get precedence over 'walk ups', I don't see how this should be any other way.

Neither do I, just an earlier misunderstanding in the thread.

it was the 'no income' if only those with memberships were attending in your comment that made me reply, if that was due to previous confusion apologies.

it's commendable to those paying upfront no matter the outcome, but no-one should be left out of pocket even if they can afford it. Some may well be happy for the club to keep any excess if they aren't able to offer a seat for all the games, however a rotating arrangement for full members whom have paid up front would be a fair way to allow people to attend.

With some not being able to make games possibly the maximum number may not even be attained, I wonder if there's an easy way/system that could connect to other fans to attend if those allocated a spot notified in advance they couldn't attend for a particular game.

I am a passholder and am classed as extremely vulnerable, have had the vacine but would probably not be confident enough to attend. There must be many others in the same position. The club could maybe ask passholders to register their intensions to full advantage of the restrictions.