I've said it before, and I'll say it again. The extremely scary thing is that on redvee Sad one comes across as one of the more reasonable posters!!

. I was reading the Salford forum this week seeing how they were getting on with their fundraising thing(and hoping for some dupree gossip)and they'd obviously just played saints. Quite a few of their fans said they'd rather win nothing if being successful turned them into fans like saints have got.

Why are you bleeting on at us for?

I'm sure I speak for a lot of Wire fans, I'm really not bothered if all or none of your lot get banned or not.

We all know that the MRP 'rules' are in pencil on the back of a fag packet, most fans just accept it but Saints seem to think they're on some kind of crusade for evidence of conspiracy.

My view exactly. The topic is as dull as ditch water.

Ignored my own advice! Let them bleat, who cares?

Maybe we could have a thread dedicated to "Saints Disciplinary Conspiracy Theory" and let Saddened go nuts in it and others swerve it.

I sympathise, but also like having Saddened's rants close at hand as counter evidence to the recurring claims that he is a reasonable and fair minded poster, when of course he is anything but.

Not done himself any favours with constant Knowles as caused the problem getting a ban overturned, he just won’t let it go.

Knowles has caused the disciplinary another problem, how many matches to give him for that tackle last night

Lost the argument in the second sentence there pal. That's going some even for you.

If Knowles gets a refer to tribunal today be ready for the alarm on your mobile device to sound and head straight to your nearest bomb shelter, ear defenders will be supplied if Saddened turns up in your zone

I must admit that, from the comments I've seen, even Saints fans are starting to realise the problem is with Knowles, not the disciplinary panel or the referees. I'm also interested in what comes out: not because I thought it was the very worst tackle I've ever seen, but because I'm interested in what kind of message they are going to give to a guy who can't complete a single full game after suspension without belting someone round the head.

You just don't get it do you? Just because he sticks his arm out at head height, the opposition player has a duty of care to avoid his arm and NOT to wilfully attack the arm with his head.



Just imagine the damage that could be done to poor Morgan's arm by someone's head remaining on their shoulders! I mean, if they ran into his arm hard enough they could even cause a tingling sensation or light bruising - why isn't the disciplinary committee clamping down on these players' vicious attacks on Morgan's outstretched arm?



It's not fair I tell you, that poor boy needs the refs to look after him better