The club should too. I know it wouldn't happen, but do you reckon they'd have given their "blessing" if he'd signed for Leeds and got in the back door?

Much in the same way that Hetherington has yet to call the Catalans a disgrace to Rugby League you mean?

No, I don't think they do. But I think they would if the Border Agency decided suddenly he's not so bad a sort after all, and let him in to play [iagainst [/ius, despite him being too undesirable a character to be admitted to play [ifor[/ius.



Because of that absurd result, I really don't think they would open themselves up to obvious ridicule by overruling their own decision in that way.



Though it has been the case for years now that nothing, absolutely [inothing[/i that this "goverment" did should surprise us, corrupt, lying, incompetent shower of nest-lining, self-serving, deceitful thieves that they are.

Thought you were a master of accuracy and detail? You missed out self-deluding, hypocritical, scheming, cheating, faithless, reactive, betraying-of-principles, abandoning-of-roots, unprincipled, history-rewriting and absolutely thoroughly useless, if I recall?

If you had bothered to read the previous statement you would have seen that I was reffering to restriction of trade, EU law, and not visa restrictions, UK Law











Or should I assume that Bulls don't read things properly?

Oh dear...not sure you realise what you have let yourself in for now once the 'Vark starts on you...hope you have plenty of time?

Hey, no need to get all indignant. Your restraint of trade point is an interesting one, but the post I replied to was specifically your claim that the EU Court (sic) overrides any party states national law. This was, of course, dealing with the precise opposite of your previous post which you made clear was talking about the position "irrespective of national laws".

Told you...

It's a fair bet that they don't read at all.

My apologies, to get things straight the EU can override ANY party states national law Including Sovereignty laws. The European court is the highest in the land as the Single European Act of 1972 was enshrined within UK law in 1972. I don't think they would be interested in altering UK visa restrictions without serious cause, however, The EU's anti competition laws are very strict, and binding, and the RFL santioning this move would be considered a restraint of trade on the other 13 Super League club's



I hope this clears the ambiguity up.



Have a nice day

It certainly clears up the ambiguity concerning your status as a c*ck.



And you tries the legal joke once and didn't get a bite because it wasn't funny. There was no need to try again.