Quote Deadcowboys1="Deadcowboys1"unless Orange is right & we get a spot in the 20 on location, development & ground.'"
It is the only explanation I can think.of that makes any sense. We didn't fill trailfinders once when we got back into SL
Any other sport would already have next year's format in place, with a clear plan for any changes the year after......but nope, that's too sensible for Rugby League.
If London haven't been given the nod for a spot in SL, be that SL one or two and yet are still moving to Wimbledon, I can see the club bankrupt and out of business inside 3 years.
As I understand it, London are paying £200,000 a year for 12 home games a year and all they get fiscally for it is ticket revenue? Wimbledon own all the bars and food concessions.....Jesus. even at Brentford you could buy 6 VB in a bucket from the club. If they think they'll get enough fans to cover the rent then they're dreaming....better to stay at ealing for at least one more year and try and rebuild the club....Wimbledon will still be there if things change, but at th moment.....1 venue for everything has to be the better way. Doesn't it?
