Funny, so did I.



So far, I haven't seen one of them stick his/her head above the parapet in support of the idea.

Maybe Nadine hasn't got up yet.

[url=http://publiclawforeveryone.wordpress.com/2013/07/01/legal-aid-judicial-review-permission-applications-and-the-daily-mail-setting-the-record-straight/Response to the Mail's swivel-eyed histrionics[/url

He doesn't seem to mention (unless it's lost in jargon) that alot of prospective judicial reviews do not go ahead because the insturments of the state back down beforehand.

So, basically, the Daily Mail is trumpeting utter nonsense through its nether orifice.



Unfortunately, out there in Pooterland, the Mail's version will by now be considered to be unassailable, proven, iron-clad fact.

You sound surprised.

The only time I've seriously threatened judicial review, UKBA backed down pretty sharpish. Mentioning it in passing usually gets them panicking too, so I suspect you may be right