Quote SmokeyTA="SmokeyTA"No, he hasnt. He has been accused of one. Its how the justice system in this country has worked for over a thousand years. Someone is accused of something, we presume they are innocent until proven otherwise.
Even the bail jumping accusation has yet to be proven in a court of law.
No, they havent. They have judged that the procedure which resulted in an EAW being served on Mr Assange was followed correctly and as per British law should be followed. They havent judged the merit of the allegations.I think the standard of evidence should be that which would likely lead to trial in this country as a minimum.'"
Yes he has. He has broken his bail conditions, the entire world has seen him breach bail.
Yes they have. Are there, or are there not, allegations of rape and sexual crimes to answer in Sweden? What other definition of "having a case to answer" is there?
Of course they haven't judged the merit of the allegations, that's for a trial to do.
So you think that evidence that would be produced in a trial in Sweden should be put before a British court first? That would immediately prejudice the trial in Sweden and would lead to a defacto trial taking place in Britain.
Once again, you are demanding a trial take place before a suspect is arrested.