Quote af="af"If the first team squad isn't competitive, that club might not be a SL side in ten or even three years time.
A balance obviously has to be struck, but that will always be easier for clubs bankrolled by millionaires than it is for those that have to live by their own means.'"
I don't know if you're aiming that comment at Leeds but its' very wide of the mark.
When Paul Caddick came to Leeds they were insolvent and heavily in debt. They were in a worse position than most other clubs in the league. The season before they had narrowly avoided relegation.
Caddick and Hetherington put in place a business model that saw the club trade its' own way out of debt and become the commercial organisation that it is today. They did not do it by "bankrolling" the club. Caddick didn't introduce funds to the Rhinos (unlike his pet hobby the Tykes). The Rhinos were sustained on their own notwithstanding having an independently wealthy chairman.
Throughout this period they showed a commitment to junior development in the face of growing unrest from their supporters. It has paid dividends.
Of course, its' very easy for clubs who have paid scant regard to their junior development to whine about how easy it is for the big rich clubs to do it in an effort to excuse themselves.
The fact is Leeds did it when they were not successful, Leeds did it when they were very broke and the argument about service areas aside there is no excuse for any club failing to invest in a decent youth policy because whilst it doesn't reap the same short term dividends it's far cheaper than investing in overseas players.