|
Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/682cf/682cf4882e7e49b0451ad5ba5218cc0cec1e3a9f" alt="" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de4c6/de4c66c2eefbc43bb4ffae992bb36e8ab28af9ec" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7498 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2023 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="mmp"maybe Woolston shouldnt have had to either?
Having had Hindley come back in Div 6 / 5 and score 100 points on some teams it's damaging to the development of new clubs to throw such clubs into the bottom - and probably doesnt help them either! Even worse a Cumbrian team - travelling to Cumbria is an expense for any club but probably more of an issue for a new club which will have less established revenue streams and little by way of financial reserves. Can imagine clubs not wanting to go, and definately not wanting to go if its likley they will get a beating from a team that is actually well established having just missed out on winning the Barrow and District League...
I'm assuming the Barrow League is of a better standard than the bottom end of NWC???'"
No it doesnt - it's dull as dish water and when you do get a game against a higher standard of opposition your well and truely undercooked data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a3f/c0a3f0e5c6f3d3551af68cc7ba13ef43a25bb39b" alt="" icon_sad.gif" alt="icon_sad.gif" title="Sad" />
Didnt they reorganise it last year so they moved mainly second teams into div 6?
|
|
Quote ="mmp"maybe Woolston shouldnt have had to either?
Having had Hindley come back in Div 6 / 5 and score 100 points on some teams it's damaging to the development of new clubs to throw such clubs into the bottom - and probably doesnt help them either! Even worse a Cumbrian team - travelling to Cumbria is an expense for any club but probably more of an issue for a new club which will have less established revenue streams and little by way of financial reserves. Can imagine clubs not wanting to go, and definately not wanting to go if its likley they will get a beating from a team that is actually well established having just missed out on winning the Barrow and District League...
I'm assuming the Barrow League is of a better standard than the bottom end of NWC???'"
No it doesnt - it's dull as dish water and when you do get a game against a higher standard of opposition your well and truely undercooked data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a3f/c0a3f0e5c6f3d3551af68cc7ba13ef43a25bb39b" alt="" icon_sad.gif" alt="icon_sad.gif" title="Sad" />
Didnt they reorganise it last year so they moved mainly second teams into div 6?
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7498 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2023 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Ayres Rock"Didn't Hindley request to start in the bottom division to work their way up?'"
no - we were put there. I believe and I'm not certain about this but the difference between Hindley and Orrell was a a possible admin error ....
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4069 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| i really hope theyb keep the 2nd teams seperate again, especially as there are a couple of new 2nd teams coming in.
it'll also mean Div 5 can be a genuine league for new(ish) first teams with Hindley (not newish!) and Waterhead (a 2nd team to a conf club) moving up, probably Cobras too given they will be starting a 2nd team, it will hopefully mean we get a much more even competition in 5. The new clubs of recent years (Bury, Westhoughton and Chorley) will have an extra year of experience, Bolton, Bulldogs and Newton are not massively better than the three who finished bottom while Eccleston and Wild Boars will start as favourites. Can't see the new Little Hulton, Accrington or Shaw teams being hugely better than before. In the main, it'll actually be a division of clubs who have only been formed a few years if they decide to go this way...
I'd go with a division of:
Wild Boars
Eccleston
Bolton
Wigan Bulldogs
Newton
Chorley
Bury
Westhoughton
Little Hulton
Shaw
Accrington
Blackpool S (as they didnt get a single point in Div 4 last year)
Of course, that sees three teams go up, and doesnt account for Askam, but there are a lot of clubs asking about moving divisions higher up the league so it might be possible.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 746 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2012 | Sep 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Got to agree with that, Hindley and Rochdale wiped the floor with everyone, and towards the end if i remember rightly a lot of teams didnt show up to play them. Newton i think are going to struggle for a team in all honesty, the lads at training i can guarantee that 5 or 6 of them come a match day wont be there, and a few core players have gone elsewhere. Fingers crossed though. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a3f/c0a3f0e5c6f3d3551af68cc7ba13ef43a25bb39b" alt="" eusa_pray.gif" alt="icon_razz.gifRAY:" title="PRAY" />
|
|
Got to agree with that, Hindley and Rochdale wiped the floor with everyone, and towards the end if i remember rightly a lot of teams didnt show up to play them. Newton i think are going to struggle for a team in all honesty, the lads at training i can guarantee that 5 or 6 of them come a match day wont be there, and a few core players have gone elsewhere. Fingers crossed though. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0a3f/c0a3f0e5c6f3d3551af68cc7ba13ef43a25bb39b" alt="" eusa_pray.gif" alt="icon_razz.gifRAY:" title="PRAY" />
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 207 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2013 | Jul 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| New Springs are in big trouble aswell, a few players left to try their hand in the National Conference and poor numbers at training. Despite being promoted last season we're really struggling at the minute and I doubt we will see the start of the season.
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de4c6/de4c66c2eefbc43bb4ffae992bb36e8ab28af9ec" alt="" | |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD |
---|
19.67M | 489 | 80,283 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
|
|