If he has i see no reason why it has yet to be announced officially. I would suspect he is still in talks with a number of clubs and has not actually signed for anyone as yet.

There was almost two years between the incident and the actual conviction and then sentencing.



In between Justin sorted him out which is why he got his new contract

Tommy Lee. No thanks, we are trying to improve the team. Why do you think a club third to bottom are letting him go.

Hindsight's a wonderful thing, but I wouldn't have given a new contract to someone with a potential jail sentence hanging over him.

Fair point, I do not think Tommy is quite the handful Ben is/was anyway.

That may have helped towards him not getting a custodial.

Not a chance. The judge may have paid attention to what the club said but the new contact wouldn't have any influence

He won't be but he seems to be getting himself a reputation. Maybe a move away is the best thing he could do

Mate most of it is bollox. Though he did get lamped one by Burnett for being a tit.

So why you signed Hodgson then

and Matt Cook

Agree, a few of them will be benefit from it, good luck to them all hope they can all settle down and get on with their jobs and do well.

I agree. (if we'd have kept him ive said many times that Lee should have started with Houghton off the bench when Berro goes)

Ah so you wouldnt take any player from any clubs beneath 4th?

Thats not what he said.

so what did he say then

He said that a player who is been released by a third from bottom club isnt good enough for us. Seems a pretty fair statement to me.

He said letting go, by letting go I assume he means not offering a new contract as you did with Josh

we offered him less than what hes on now (12,000) and you should be thankful or you'd owe us a fee!!

I'd say thats your problem not ours, could always have offered him 12001

that would be unfair to the lad, this way if another club wants him he can go without the other club worrying, especially if their skint, about a fee.

Thats a real incentive to progess isn't it, a pay cut!!!!





If as most say he was going to leave anyway why didn't Hull offer him more or the same so they could sting Rovers for a fee??

So all players released by bottom 3 clubs for whatever reason would never sign for clubs that have finished higher in previous seasons and add something to their squad?

Why would we when he brings little to our squad?

Why offer him anything then??



Seems to lack logic all round to me.





£2k hardly seems worth fighting over particularly when you could have got a fee.

ive already put why.