I have to say I'm bloody livid about this team. If there was ever a chance for Agar to try Richard Whiting at half back it was tonight. I cant bloody believe that he has put Tansey in the half backs and Whiting at at full back. The dropping of Calderwood is madness as well.

I have spent a lot of time defending Mr Agar on this message board, but after tonight I'm beginning to wonder if I have been right!

I do not know the ins and outs just that he had a spat with Agar and I was told earlier in the week he would not feature.

same here

Where have I disagreed? Seriously Robin look at my posts all I have done is put the reasoning behind it. Its a call between Briscoe and Hall, Yeamo, Raynor and Calderwood!



The fact there is no G.Horne and Thorman in the backline is far more agreeable.



Against a big Catalans team Agar has picked a strong Briscoe. If we win it will be a great call and if we lose you will keep showing your love for Mark Calderwood. I appreciate your concern but really dont understand it.

Many on here were saying that Agar should go for youth now that your season has effectively ended.

And an outstanding call it was eh!

The guys injured ffs.

Why are the kr fans interested/bothered about our coaches decisions etc anyway

It would have been a good sentence if you had finished it after Go.

I know that and I am not belittling that situtation.

But Agar Dropped you most consistant/commited player for 2 players who have come back from injury.

That was a bad call as there is always a posibility that 1 would have a breakdown.

Team should have been:



Tansey

Calderwood

Briscoe

Hall

Raynor

Whiting

Berrigan

Dowes

Houghton

Cordoba

Tickle

Burnett

Horne



Radford

Moa

King

Lee



They must have known beforehand that Yeaman wasn't 100%

Rubbish. You cannot predict injuries and you are taking the pee with those comments.



Out of order.

Incorrect.

Look at my comments previous to the one you have highlighted to prove my point.

Lets see why, maybe he doesnt know how to complain in French

Why?.....Briscoe shouldnt be near the team,no form or gametime to warrant a place in the team....Agar is a utter numpty.

I dont see the players every day at training so cant really answer that TBF.



However that Tom Briscoe aint a bad player is he?

how and why do you accomodate a player and drop a player that has obviously been in form for most of the season forgive me if i'm wrong i'm just going to accomodate myself with someone that gives a fxxk

Tansey comes in and does a good job at full-back and in no time atall we go to plan B. Our best and definitely most committed player gets dropped in favour of an 18 yr old who has had a long road back from injury. I've no faith in Agar, he can spot a good player but his thinking is so muddled.

Dropping Calderwood - our best player this season - to bring in an 18 year old who hasn't played in four months was a terrible decision.



I'm looking forward to hearing Agar's comments on this.

I'm baffled as to why some fans think bringing Brscoe back in favour of Calderwood was a tough call. It's no such thing. Young Tom shouldn't be anywhere near the team. I like Briscoe, we all like Briscoe but dropping our best player....what can you say?!?!?!

It should have been a staright call for the idiot Agar between Biscoe / Yeaman for the one centre spot other than that the the backs picked themselves.

Calderwood should have been on the bench as a minimum although it should have been Briscoe in my view. Briscoe could have moved to centre or there were other options. Agar's selection policy in this game is reason enough for him to be replaced. That said the players are unable to discharge their responsibilities such as carrying and catching the ball on a weekly basis and the sooner that this squad is replaced almost in its entirety the better.

Doesnt matter who plays if your completion rate is less then 50% then you will lose....again.