In an ideal world we could have signed Eseh and Watts to bolster our front row and used the quota spot on either a second row or a centre.

In an ideal world we could have signed Eseh and Watts to bolster our front row and used the quota spot on either a second row or a centre.

Each time he left a club he had issues with the coach at the time. 

Personally rather go with Knight and Eseh, if they go well then maybe look to tie them down long term. Whereas with Watts would we get more than a year out of him at this stage of his career? 

Each time he left a club he had issues with the coach at the time. 

Personally rather go with Knight and Eseh, if they go well then maybe look to tie them down long term. Whereas with Watts would we get more than a year out of him at this stage of his career? 

Can see the appeal as we still need size up front. But he's not what he was. I'd pass.

Wonder if Cartwright has seen enough of our depth options in thr middle already. Knight, Eseh and potentially Watts in a week

Can see the appeal as we still need size up front. But he's not what he was. I'd pass.

Wonder if Cartwright has seen enough of our depth options in thr middle already. Knight, Eseh and potentially Watts in a week

Never go back as they say. Watts is a shadow of the player that left us and his fitness from the watching Cas’ last 3 games looks very questionable. 

Had we used the quota spot to sign a quality back rower, I may have been swayed or at least understand some logic in entertaining the possibility of Watts in the interim but with Knight along Eseh on loan don’t see any reason to even contemplate Watts. 

Never go back as they say. Watts is a shadow of the player that left us and his fitness from the watching Cas’ last 3 games looks very questionable. 

Had we used the quota spot to sign a quality back rower, I may have been swayed or at least understand some logic in entertaining the possibility of Watts in the interim but with Knight along Eseh on loan don’t see any reason to even contemplate Watts.