Morally, Michaels should be exiled from the squad, until the drug matter is dealt with.

Our Coaching set up is to inexperienced.

We need a DOR who could help and advise Radford. Also the said man would be able to attract talent .

All pie in the sky , utopian thinking I know !!

Schofields column was interesting reading today

Backing up is an in built thing, sorry to say none of our backs have that instinct in them (nor the pace). Watch our 19's, every time a break is made you can guarantee Lancaster, Logan, HTW etc. are all flooding through in support. They sniff opportunities.

I want Lancaster in the team, always have, and for what the bin man does I don't see any reason why he can't do it from centre and bin Yeaman off.

Another problem is Shaul, absolutely terrible 'link man' got no passing ability at all. We either swap him for Rankin (who may not be quite as safe under the high ball) or we go back to playing Westerman at 1st receiver, push our halves a little wider and use Shaul as an option runner. Westerman (obviously aware he's behind the others due to England commitments) has been below par because his role has changed, again!

Quote ="*1865*"Backing up is an in built thing, sorry to say none of our backs have that instinct in them (nor the pace). Watch our 19's, every time a break is made you can guarantee Lancaster, Logan, HTW etc. are all flooding through in support. They sniff opportunities. I want Lancaster in the team, always have, and for what the bin man does I don't see any reason why he can't do it from centre and bin Yeaman off. Another problem is Shaul, absolutely terrible 'link man' got no passing ability at all. We either swap him for Rankin (who may not be quite as safe under the high ball) or we =#0000FFgo back to playing Westerman at 1st receiver, push our halves a little wider and use Shaul as an option runner. Westerman (obviously aware he's behind the others due to England commitments) has been below par because his role has changed, again!'" I'd go for option b), please. Plays to the strengths of more players IMO, and with a still-struggling attack I don't think it's a good idea to add a fullback who can be iffy under kicks to our defence.

Quote ="*1865*"Backing up is an in built thing, sorry to say none of our backs have that instinct in them (nor the pace). Watch our 19's, every time a break is made you can guarantee Lancaster, Logan, HTW etc. are all flooding through in support. They sniff opportunities. I want Lancaster in the team, always have, and for what the bin man does I don't see any reason why he can't do it from centre and bin Yeaman off. Another problem is Shaul, absolutely terrible 'link man' got no passing ability at all. We either swap him for Rankin (who may not be quite as safe under the high ball) or we =#0000FFgo back to playing Westerman at 1st receiver, push our halves a little wider and use Shaul as an option runner. Westerman (obviously aware he's behind the others due to England commitments) has been below par because his role has changed, again!'" I'd go for option b), please. Plays to the strengths of more players IMO, and with a still-struggling attack I don't think it's a good idea to add a fullback who can be iffy under kicks to our defence.

You have one!