Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
The OP is talking tosh! Horne has been a good player who has always given his all but in the last 5 years would he have been a starting half for any of the top 4 teams? We all have had a whinge this season. Halfback has been our Achilles heel for far too long. I have the upmost respect for Rich bit if we are ever to change as a club we needed to make big changes. Two new halfbacks is what we needed. I think from what was available we've done as well as we could so lets give Rich the credit he deserves but also realise he wasn't going to make us a top of the league side
thing is about horne, he was a top talent, but now at 32 them days are way behind him IMO...
I honestly believe the man was at least 3 years past his best, and the decsion in my opinion is a correct one.... no room for sentiment, if your not good enough nomore then your out for me.., we've kept hold of players far too long for afew years, time to move onwards and upwards for both parties concerned
QuoteC for Cuckoo="C for Cuckoo"Our performances have picked up and we just beat the league leaders so our boo-boys need to find something new to complain about.
"Player retires after 16 seasons? It must be a conspiracy. RADFORD OUT!"'"
just look at the stats so far you will see which player has had more influence on games ,Horne is a legend and always will be .All this tripe about mates is ridiculous must really hate radford to suggest he as signed Pryce because he is a mate
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.