Why 'Funny' ?

Too damned right.

I'm confused, have we established that Pearson has the biggest balls or Hudgell?



Seriously, I saw more mature discussion at my secondary school.

So the children who committed this revolting act were drunk to boot, you silly little man?



This is a warning shot across the bows by the club to tell parents to be responsible for and accountable for the actions of their little darlings whilst in the KC. And quite right too. If more parents gave their children strict guidelines and boundaries and punished them accordingly when breached, society would be filled with the sort of well-balanced adult we uniformly witnessed in Britain 40 years ago and still see in Europe.



Instead, a couple of pc generations on, we are the inheritors of the lawless mindless types we see more and more today who simply have no idea of what constitutes acceptable behaviour drunk or otherwise. The pie and lighter throwers would be an example, as would Andy who took the law into his own hands and smacked innocent people as a result. The Galpharm morons are amother obvious example.

Er I was talking about incidents at Rovers

'The one constant' and the fact that you created this thread, called it 'Mindless idiots' and were, in fact, still posting on page 5 of the same thread after it had been pointed out on page 2 that the culprits were aged about ten, suggests otherwise.



In fact, alcohol is not 'the one constant' as is illustrated by this case. It's a common catalyst, but society's shortcomings with respect to the education and disciplining of our children as to what are the basic rights and wrongs of behaviour is the constant factor, I believe.