This isn't what I imagined it would be, and we're opposing it. Can't see that it would affect us anyway www.totalrl.com/?p=2750948

This isn't what I imagined it would be, and we're opposing it. Can't see that it would affect us anyway www.totalrl.com/?p=2750948

Quote Mrs Barista="Mrs Barista"This isn't what I imagined it would be, and we're opposing it. Can't see that it would affect us anyway www.totalrl.com/?p=2750948'" And, if the vote goes against it, will Wigan still be able to fit Tomkins into their cap?

Quote Mrs Barista="Mrs Barista"This isn't what I imagined it would be, and we're opposing it. Can't see that it would affect us anyway www.totalrl.com/?p=2750948'" And, if the vote goes against it, will Wigan still be able to fit Tomkins into their cap?

ken davey makes some valid points

its a no for me regardless if we can afford it, it will go back to them who have and them who dont!

Interesting that the dobbins have changed sides...............

I sort of get the sentiment to retain players like Tomkins in Super League. But just not sure how many players/clubs it impacts.

How many of their homegrown players earn more than £100k? I don't think any of their 1-17 squad numbers are homegrown. Krissy Welham?

No but with their new benefactor they could have 3 world class players and "only" spend £450k

Oh yeah. Didn't read that bit properly.

Too subtle for me, I'm afraid.

Hard to argue with Ken Davy's points. Stupid idea being introduced at exactly the wrong time to suit one or two rich loudmouths.

No doubt it will pass easily.

Sorry, might not be reading it properly, but how could they have 3? surely its only 1 player whos on not home grown, on say 400k and only 150k would count on cap

Maybe I'm reading it wrong. I saw a reference to non homegrown players and presumed it meant multiples of players but it's probably just meaning 1 per club