Doesn't help either club re. the SL criteria point for turnover though. Who would get the income from use of the stadium for other activities during the week etc. Splitting it would only dilute the amount of revenue either club could possibly generate.

Well you wont be getting any income from other activities at your stadium anyway, because you will be tennants.

Have you seen the tenancy agreement?

You are banned from this site foxtrot oscar.

Surely you can get that from the mirror?

Is there a shortfall?

I'm basing it on what i read in the press, the story about the development looking to be done in phases due to the difficulty in finding the funding. Richard Wright attributed this to the recession. I'm happy to be corrected if this is not the case anymore.

I remember reading about it being done in phases.

But maybe we have got the finances, we just don't have access to it at the moment - i.e. obstacles in the way - which means we have to do it in phases. Doesn't necessarily indicate a shortfall.

never stop believing !

I know that plant pot





We'll both stay out of it Mick for the same reasons

you frighten the Mafia may come n bully ya

There is no reason why you cannot bring your kids to either Belle Vue or The Jungle to watch games.