Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
I've just reviewed this webpage about planning objections on Wakefield Council's own website, where they clearly state that they will consider objections which are borne from disagreeing with the PRINCIPLE of the development.
The council can only keep defending themselves for so long. Whilst previous criticisms have been levelled at the council, the objection we have now is so specific that there would be no room for them to wiggle. They either ignore it and embarrass themselves or they listen.
Let's keep the pressure up!!
I've just reviewed this webpage about planning objections on Wakefield Council's own website, where they clearly state that they will consider objections which are borne from disagreeing with the PRINCIPLE of the development.
The council can only keep defending themselves for so long. Whilst previous criticisms have been levelled at the council, the objection we have now is so specific that there would be no room for them to wiggle. They either ignore it and embarrass themselves or they listen.
I actually don't know why by the way (I'm not in the know at all), but I just spotted it on the application page. Just figured that there's no point overanalysing something we know nothing about
QuoteRugbyFanMan="RugbyFanMan"I actually don't know why by the way (I'm not in the know at all), but I just spotted it on the application page. Just figured that there's no point overanalysing something we know nothing about
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.